Topic > Stem cell debate - 1794

Embryonic stem cell research is a sensitive and much debated topic. There are many benefits of researching this technology as it will be beneficial to many people. In this essay I will explain the concept of embryonic stem cells and the importance of their use in medical development. Furthermore, I will show the flaws in the arguments of those who oppose the use of stem cells. The country will lag behind in utilizing this development if there is no logical conclusion to this important issue. The human body has more than 200 different types of cells. Embryonic stem cells: A group of cells arises from all of these cell types. These exceptional cells come from the inner cell mass of the blastocyst which is a young embryo of approximately five to four years old (Holland et all, 2001). These cells are pluripotent and this makes them unique. Therefore, it is easy to characterize these cells differently in any of the germ layers existing in the human body such as mesoderm, ectoderm, and endoderm. The endoderm includes the lungs, intestines and stomach. The mesoderm is mainly made up of bones, muscles and blood. This leaves the ectoderm with the nervous system and skin. These cells can repair any part of the human body, making embryonic stem cells special. Another element of these cells is that they are capable, under any circumstances, of replicating for an indefinite period. The fact that these cells can be produced in unlimited numbers and have the characteristic of becoming any type of 220 cells facilitates their use in medicine for medical research and regenerative therapy (Holland et all, 2001). Tissues damaged or lost due to injury or disease can be easily replaced or repaired with new tissues developed from administered embryonic cells. Once there is the administration of the root ce...... middle of paper ......no law cannot enact laws that respect a religious institution or prohibit its freedom. This means that religious values ​​and religion must remain separate from government and politics. The debate over embryonic stem cell research is a classic example of why the Constitution provides for this concept. Politicians must honor the Constitution and draw logical conclusions to fund research while ensuring that many citizens receive quality care. The arguments contained in the document clearly show that the pros are stronger than the cons. The pros use a scientific approach and evidence while the cons think about ethical and religious issues. The United States continues to lag behind other nations in medicine, but the potential is enormous. Works Cited Holland, S & Lebacqz, K, & Zoloth, L. (2001). The human embryonic stem cell debate: science, ethics and public policy. Michigan: MIT Press