The questions ask general questions that describe a person's personality across different environments and situations. I found the test reliable. I think if I took the test again I would get similar answers. However, for some people the test may not be as reliable. Participants' mood may cause them to evaluate some questions differently than before (Funder, 2013, p. 45). I also think the test would produce results applicable to various people because it asked a good set of questions in a way that wasn't too specific that it would influence anyone who took it. The only questions that might pose a problem for people would be the amount of interaction with people. In some cultures it is acceptable and normal to be around lots of people, and in some cultures you shouldn't interact much with others. So different participants might evaluate some questions based on their social norm rather than how they really are as people. Another concern with this personality test was that I thought it was a little long. While the more questions the better for the data, I believe that once participants get to the next page they can simply click on any answer. I suggest asking only 10 or 30 questions per page so that participants can focus on each question. I think the test overall is great if people answer the question