Topic > Pbl relies on learning groups while projects can be done individually

Student groups determine their own projects and, in doing so, ask for student participation by encouraging them to take full responsibility for their own learning. This is what makes PBL different from Projects as students work together to achieve specific goals. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original EssayWhen students use technology as a tool to communicate with others, they take an active role rather than a passive role in conveying information through a teacher, book, or broadcast. The student constantly makes choices about how to obtain, view, or manipulate information, while debating and using their critical thinking skills to choose what is best for them. The same goes for projects, but the possibility of using the knowledge, information, ideas and opinions of others is missing. Technology allows students to actively think about the choices they make and execute. Each student has the opportunity to bring something to the table to fulfill their role within their group. The teacher no longer plays the role of instructor in Project Based Learning, but of facilitator, hence the previous description. It's not about giving up control of the classroom or student learning, but rather about developing an atmosphere of shared responsibility. Since the instructor must structure the proposed question/problem in a way that directs student learning towards content-based materials. While for projects the teacher must create guidelines and structures in which students can work to collectively arrive at the same project or the same answers while leaving students the freedom to design a project that they can present with the same information or answers. For PBL the facilitator must regulate student success with intermittent, transitional goals to ensure that student projects remain focused and that students have a deep understanding of the concepts being investigated, discovered, and discussed. Students are held accountable for achieving these goals through ongoing feedback and evaluation from the facilitator. Ongoing assessment and feedback are essential to ensure that students remain within the framework of the project's guidance question and core standards. The facilitator must be able to track and monitor ongoing formative assessments, which show work towards that standard while using these assessments to guide the inquiry process and ensure that students have learned the required content. Once the project is finished, the instructor evaluates the finished product and learns to demonstrate it. While individual projects are evaluated summatively and show the knowledge acquired by students without their learning process. The teacher can only determine the student's level of critical thinking skills by evaluating the final product/project. Please note: this is just an example. Get a customized paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay The student's role is to ask questions, build knowledge, and determine a real solution to the problem/question presented. Students must collaborate by expanding their active listening skills and requiring them to engage in intelligent, purposeful communication. Therefore, allowing them to think rationally about how to solve problems. PBL forces students to take responsibility for their own success. While the projects are being used.