IndexGun Control DebateThe Effects of Gun Control on Crime and HomicideConclusionWorks CitedHomicide has been ranked among the leading non-medical causes of death in the United States. Every day, an average of thirteen children between the ages of ten and nineteen are killed by gunfire, with the highest percentage of these children injured in the crossfire. For example, in African American communities, it is a common occurrence for young people to die as a result of homicide, particularly involving the use of a firearm. The situation has therefore forced most people in the United States to believe that the only way to reduce or even eliminate the growing crime rate of all states is to establish multiple gun control policies. Through data analysis and common observation, several people have refuted this claim that firearms have nothing to do with increasing crime rates. However, supporters of gun control measures urge the government to eliminate gun manufacturers, sellers and even owners to the extent that no American citizen can carry or even possess guns. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original Essay On the other hand, the National Rifle Association (NRA), which is the community that does not oppose gun control, counterattacks the position after its strengthening with the Second Amendment. Every citizen has the right to "bear arms". “Although firearms are the most commonly used firearms to commit crimes, gun control laws will have little or no effect on the crime rate problem. Partly due to media violence, social explosion and general lack of knowledge, the circulation of weapons has become rampant, so eliminating them all remains a major problem. Gun Control Debate The issue of gun control dates back to the creation of the National Rifle Association. The topic is reinforced by politicians, thus receiving a lot of attention not only from Americans but also from the rest of the world. Initially, the NRA's primary objectives were to induce training of Union soldiers through the design of marksmanship and, at the same time, provide competent marksmanship techniques. Now, the group has lobbied hard against gun control and argued that more guns make the country safer. Therefore, there are multiple gun control laws and regulations that the NRA continues to fight against. Meanwhile, advocates for gun rights, as well as gun control, have competed, each with evidence to support their claims. The Democratic government took the front line in support of the policies while the Republicans called on the government to respect gun rights. If that were the case, both Democrats and Republicans would struggle to comply within government. The primary goal of pro-gun advocacy is to water down established laws and, at the same time, repeal attempts to install new ones. The Effects of Gun Control on Crime and Homicide The primary issue undermining gun control is that of its impact on crime rather than homicide. Both those opposed to gun control and its supporters have valid points, but only the government can discern and respond with immediate effect. Due to the disparities that exist between Republicans and Democrats as a result of the issue of gun control, the party that wins remains in favor of its applicant. If iDemocrats take control, it is possible that they will establish multiple gun control policies. Likewise, if Republicans were to take control of the country, they could uphold the Second Amendment on the issue of gun rights and also erase all already established gun control regulations. The gun control debate has always reached a stalemate; Individuals who support gun rights and oppose laws regulating guns believe that gun control measures do not decrease crime but rather increase it at an uncontrollable rate. Meanwhile, considering the relationship between gun control and increased crime, people's claims and arguments cannot determine whether one party deserves support. However, through the evaluation of available past statistics, it is possible to understand which side of the issue suits society best. “Therefore, to measure and examine the quantifiable consequences of gun control on homicide and crime, two challenges are bound to arise.” First, gun control, in general terms, is about the specific regulations and laws enforced by the legislature limiting firearms and safety measures such as triggers or safety components applied to pistols and firearms. It is essential to realize how multiple governing bodies interact; federal, local and state, as well as laws, influence both homicide and crime through a unique and entire relationship of each application and provision. Furthermore, laws vary not only from the federal to state level, but also from state to state. Multiple rules do not necessarily give consensus for similar reproduction of empirical data at all levels. Secondly, regardless of how offensive the laws are, different legislative levels apply them differently. It is necessary to consider the fallacy of the human aspect of law enforcement while considering the intentions of the law. Some laws will be precisely written, but enforced with less or no rigor. The factors mentioned above have made attempts to measure and examine crime and homicide, and the impact imposed by gun control, difficult to calculate. Meanwhile, available statistics may reveal a connection between crime and gun control, but that depends on which side of the argument presents the data. The concentration and focus of particular data plays a significant role in demonstrating that gun control has no impact on homicides and crime or that gun control reduces homicides and crime. The consequences that gun control places on crime and homicide relate only to crimes of a violent nature. In this case, it is assumed that firearms, particularly handguns, will be the most effective weapons for committing such a crime. Furthermore, over half of the crimes committed involved a firearm (Saltzman., et al. 3045). As the government has imposed strict regulations and restrictions on owning, carrying and purchasing firearms, the number of firearm-related crimes is said to steadily reduce by an average of 10% each year. Such statistics have motivated most people to think that gun control can reduce crime rates. Furthermore, this is compelling factual evidence. However, in 1999, Levitt reports that nearly 6.3 million violent crimes were committed. Such crimes include robbery, rape and sexual assault. Of all crimes, only 8% of crimes, a total of 500,000, involved the use of a firearm. Statistics clearly show that gun control is not directlyrelated to crime reduction. Regardless, with or without guns, the crime rate would still be high. Knowing this makes it unfair to implement gun control policies as they undermine individuals who legally own and use guns. Furthermore, Washington DC is an example, which proves that gun control laws cannot curb the growing number of crimes in the United States. In 1976, the city adopted what many people recognized as the most restrictive gun control laws in the entire nation. Once the new policies, which undermine the use of guns, were established, DC saw a 134% increase in crime rate. When gun control laws are introduced, guns become more in demand, which makes it easier for someone to illegally purchase a firearm through a black market-like venue. Establishing concealed carry laws is also an essential aspect that requires close attention. Under the legislation, people who own legal guns can carry them concealed, but gun control advocates think the only ones who deserve that honor are military personnel or law enforcement. However, all states that took the initiative to implement these laws saw a crime rate reduction of 8.5%. Assaults were reduced by 7 percent, while rape and robbery were reduced by 5 and 3 percent, respectively. An example of a state that saw the highest percentage decline after implementing the law is Texas. Its crime rate has decreased by fifty percent compared to the rest of the country. It is clear that people have not received the statistics; this is why they rely on the media, who choose the aspect to present based on personal interests. Meanwhile, there are no official reasons to support the growing number of crimes, excluding the issue of guns. In addition to gun control, problems with violent TV shows and movies, unemployment, aggressive music, and violent lyrics written by artists have been linked to criminal activity. Children and teenagers are exposed to the gun environment, and after absorbing the violent behavior of the media, many people think it could cause problems. Gun control advocates will use such claims to support their arguments. The fact that children come into possession of guns that they use to commit crimes does not justify why a legitimate gun user and owner deserves to surrender his or her gun. Various other measures curb the issue of crimes involving firearms, but supporters of gun control policies have not implemented gun control legislation according to their true desires. That said, the accessibility and use of guns by minors should be regulated by parents or other forms of authority. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Conclusion From this essay It is clear that gun control policies will not have any impact on the issue of crime rate in the United States. First, eliminating all guns from society is a costly as well as deadly approach. However, before making any decisions, the government must consider the history of firearms in the nation by examining the recorded statistics. It is understood that most states will remain safe if gun control policies never exist. New York state had the lowest number of crimes before gun control measures were instituted. Focus on firearms as the leading cause of., 94(8), 1412-1417.