IndexSchema TheoryLife Schema TheoryLife History TheorySchema TheoryIt was introduced by Jean Piaget, Barlett and developed by Anderson in the late 1970s. This principle is made up of the set of mental structures known as schemas, which are stored in long-term memory. The schema, as cited by Kleinman (2012), represents the fundamental building blocks or units of knowledge. Each schema leads to a phase of the world, such as actions, objects and concepts. Each schema is a set of related representations of the world. It is used to understand and respond to a particular condition. The schemes present our personal simplified vision of reality derived from our previous experiences and knowledge. In relation to physical performance, this theory allows an athlete to remember and modify their behavior or performance and to focus on key information to predict a better outcome of their sporting events during competition. This discrete motor learning schema theory led to better performance in children when learning a motor task. People who suffer from a neurological disorder that has led them to acquire a motor disability require high self-regulation to meet the situational demands of their modern condition. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essaySchandler (2002) states that schema theory is based on the premise that for any given type of movement, such as throwing, catching, jumping, etc. ., we develop a scheme or set of rules. These rules of associated experiences build a pattern that will allow us to successfully execute throwing, catching, or jumping movements. Therefore, a schema is an abstract rule or generalization used to guide behavior. A person who achieves understanding is assumed to apply the schema in every single activity. It is recognized as an attempt to transform knowledge into buildings in memory that breaks down information saved in the brain and subsequently remembered and applied in reality. All our generic information is incorporated into the Rumelhart (1980) schemas. Arbib (1992) pointed out that schema was introduced in 1932 by a British psychologist Sir Frederic Barlett, many propose that Jean Piaget first introduced schema theory in 1926 and was further developed in the 1970s through Richard Anderson who focused about how knowledge is achieved, processed and organised. This knowledge is a system of intellectual structures and knowledge stored in long-term human memory. According to Emmott (2009), schema theory can also help investigators produce perfect principles such as the role of enterprise in Vygotsky's work and structure literacy inquiry. Widmayer (2005) and Mcvee (2015) pointed out that the scheme can be used not only to clarify but also to predict the situation during the 1970s. It gained importance when reading researchers began early work through cognitive scientists to discover the location of schemas in reading. The authors have studied a series of reflections on the concept of schema to reflect on how the most recent social and cultural views can instantly reconsider schemas as transactional and embodied constructs. It can be used not only to clarify but also to predict the situation of the 1970s. It gained importance when reading researchers took on the early work of cognitive scientists todiscover the role of schemas in reading. The authors studied various ideas from schema theory to contemplate how recent social and cultural perspectives might lead us to reconsider schemas as transactional and embodied constructs. Lifespan Theory Lifespan theory, as pointed out by Cajaljal (2015), helps improve adaptive personality traits, such as low neuroticism, optimism, and coping skills. Social helping and adaptive personality traits promote healthy lifestyles and practices (e.g., exercise) and help cope with health-related stressors. In Lifestyles embrace the developmental process, each age is expected to possess developmental processes. (e.g. infancy, childhood, adolescence, adulthood, and old age. This idea focuses on a category of behavior or function (such as perception, information, processing, action control, identity, personality traits, etc.) and characterization of lifespan adjustments in the mechanism and processes associated with the class of selected behaviors. Baltes (2007) states that the fundamental assumption of lifespan known as improvement is not completed in adulthood (maturity). extends through all I am involved the existence of an individual and life-long adaptive processes. Furthermore, the idea of ​​development can be used to organize evidence of life-long adaptive processes, although it is crucial to reformulate the standard concept of improvement to. this cause. On the other hand, Heckhausen (1995) deals with the primary and secondary control of concepts. The predominant control it offers over behaviors directed at the external environment and involves attempting to change the world to satisfy each individual's needs and desires. The systematic concepts of lifestyle improvement are the following: selective optimization with compensation; methodological advances; and conclusion Lindenberger (2000). Life history theory Life history theory is particularly relevant to the perception of human physical behavior. LHT is a department of evolutionary concept aimed at explaining differences in the age schedule of growth, reproduction and mortality Caldwell (2016). It proposes that humans, like other species, must alternately address how to optimally allocate limited sources of time and energy, reproduction, and protection (e.g., immune function, survival longevity). Life history theory also predicts that experiences and environments early in life, particularly across the span of development, will impact subsequent energy optimization strategies. In this way, it is very important to check the distinctive phase of an individual's existence to understand the changes and improvements that have occurred, as well as the benefits of both degrees which could also have a significant impact on behavior in later life. Kaplan (2005) argues that there is a compelling argument that integrating life history theory with evolutionary psychology provides the ability to uncover psychological variations designed to create important trade-offs over the allocation of financial resources across a lifetime. They begin with a presentation of the foundations of life history theory. The life history theory cited by Stulp (2015), focusing on the version of fertility patterns in relation to environmental factors and mortality schedules, can be understood in the use of evolutionary existence and is also followed by humans and other species. Life history theory can be integrated with evolutionary psychology..