Mother Teresa once said: 'The greatest destroyer of peace today is abortion, because it is a war against the child, a direct killing of the innocent child, a murder by the mother herself; and if we can accept that a mother can kill her own child, how can we tell others not to kill each other? Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original Essay Abortion refers to the termination of pregnancy at any stage that does not result in birth; Medically, abortion is typically defined as the termination of pregnancy by the removal or expulsion from the uterus of a fetus or embryo prior to fetal viability. An abortion can occur spontaneously, in which case it is usually called a miscarriage, or it can be induced on purpose. The term abortion most commonly refers to the induced abortion of a human rather than a non-human pregnancy. The topic of abortion has always been controversial, some argue that it should not be done, others believe that doing such an operation can be justified. But whatever the situation, there is never an acceptable reason to have an abortion. Whether or not you agree with the idea of ​​abortion can be determined by a number of factors. These factors include moral and/or religious beliefs, health concerns, or human rights reasons. The main focus of this article will be, from a humanitarian perspective, on abortion by referring to human rights as they relate to the rights to liberty and security of life, to freedom of life and the pursuit of happiness, to abortion therapeutic as they violate the right to be free from cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment, from abortion based on social and economic reasons and in situations of rape and incest. Abortion is considered wrong in the sense that every human being has the right to “life, liberty and security.” Therefore, if one accepts that the unborn child is a human being, which I do, then it follows that he is entitled to the protection afforded by this right. It can be argued that the human fetus is fragile, vulnerable and discreet, however this gives no reason to ignore or override that fetus' right to life. Failure to protect the fetus would mean that the rights of individuals are recognized only to those who exercise supremacy or distinguish themselves. The right to life is extended to all weather conditions if one has knowledge of the facts. If this right is considered non-obligatory or relative depending on the circumstances, which vary from time to time, then each individual may find himself excluded from the protection offered by the right to life. Is it still conceivable that abortion is right? I think not. If a woman's life is threatened by her unborn child, is abortion considered a woman's right? Some would agree that the mother is already alive, because she gives up her right to life and not the child who does not yet have life. But how do we determine when life begins? Many believe abortion is right if the unborn child has not reached the age of six months, which would suggest that the life of a fetus begins at six months. In my opinion, the life of a fetus begins the moment conception occurs. This would make abortion wrong. In the 1959 United Nations Declaration on the Rights of the Child, the law states in its preamble that "The child, by reason of his physical and mental immaturity, needs special safeguards and care, including adequate legal protection, both before and after after birth. This recognizes the right of a child, the evening before birth, which suggests that the fetus is alive andhas the right to life. Therefore abortion is not an act that should be condoned. From another point of view one could argue that abortion is actually right as such. ……. It states that every individual must always be accorded full human rights unless his existence interferes with the rights to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness of an already existing conscious human being. Taking this into account, it can be suggested that any woman who encounters a problem is pregnancy that interferes with her freedom of life or happiness, therefore she has the right to have an abortion if she wishes. It is further argued that in these cases of therapeutic abortion, if the woman is prohibited from performing the act, it violates that individual's right to be free from cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment. It may seem right in the eyes of some, however it is still wrong since no one can give life, therefore he has no right to take it. In my opinion if a woman commits the act of having an abortion it should be considered murder and therefore be punished for such an act. The people responsible for inducing the abortion should also be charged with conspiracy to commit murder. The most common reason women cited for having an abortion was to postpone the pregnancy to a more suitable time or to focus energy and resources on existing children. The most commonly reported reasons were socioeconomic factors such as inability to afford a child in terms of direct costs of raising the child or loss of income while caring for the child, lack of support from the father, inability to afford additional children, desire to ensure education for existing children, interruption of education, relationship problems with husband or partner, perception of being too young and unemployment. One would agree that in case a person becomes pregnant and sees no way out as she is unemployed and does not know who could be the father of the child, then an abortion would be better as that child would come into the world only to suffer at the hands of poverty. But is it right? Women need to be more humanitarian and less selfish with these children. It's like being unwanted is such a bad thing. If I had to choose between being alive and unwanted and dying in such a situation I would rather be unwanted and live and I'm sure many other people share my opinion. Another instance where abortion is considered a right is in cases involving rape and incest. Most women who find themselves in such a situation think that it is their right to have an abortion. It is understandable if a person is raped and refuses to keep that child as the thought of bringing the child into the world due to the circumstances can cause mental and emotional problems for the mother. However, from the moment a rape occurs, the decision is made whether the child is wanted or not. Therefore, in the event that an anti-shivering decision is made, that person can use emergency contraception to prevent pregnancy, thus avoiding conception and, consequently, the horrible act of abortion. Abortion is a civil right. Allowing abortion would mean denying a large segment of the population. population of their fundamental human rights. States are responsible for protecting the rights of citizens and therefore should not legalize the act of abortion. Legalizing abortion would mean abandoning this most basic human right, the right to life, of an entire class of human beings, to the brutal power of those who would kill them. Making abortion illegal, in fact, is necessary to guarantee equal rights to unborn children. It all comes back to the point mentioned before saying it's wrong.