Described by David Chalmers as one of the greatest mysteries of existence, consciousness is a topic that has become a debatable issue among practitioners of both neurology and psychology. Contradictory theories are put forward by both sides as they debate whether consciousness is purely a translation of neurons' responses or perhaps is entirely innate and unrelated to the laws of physics. In “The Puzzle of Conscious Experience,” Chalmers argues that consciousness is not necessarily related to a physical brain and that neuroscience is insufficient to provide an explanation for its emergence. Consider questions that map to objective cognitive behaviors as “the easy problems.” On the other hand, it poses a problematic dilemma about the relationship of consciousness to physicalism. Chalmers' doubt questions how a physical brain produces non-physical experiences. This question is considered the "hard problem", which no scientific clarification has been able to find as a solution. It opposes the universal rule that all existence should be able to be reduced to the fundamental characteristics of physics. Chalmers then argues that consciousness should be included in “a true theory of everything” and offers an argument as such: Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essayP1: If an entity cannot be derived from physical laws, it should be added as a new fundamental component.P2: The existence of consciousness cannot be derived from physical laws.C: The existence of consciousness should be added as a new fundamental component. The above argument is valid, since the truth of its premises guarantees the truth of the conclusion. However, this is incorrect, since the verification of P2 is uncertain. Chalmers assumes that "the hard problem" is unsolvable by anything physical; however, this fact is not confirmed by any existing theory of consciousness. Crick and Koch provide excellent reasoning for how neuroscience might be able to provide a logical explanation for why conscious experience exists. Australian philosopher Frank Jackson suggests an experiment by Mary, the color scientist, who knows all about color knowledge but lives in a black and white reality. white room and never perceived a vision of color. However, he has no experience seeing red. While this represents the distinction between brain processes and consciousness, Crick and Koch debunk it by suggesting that understanding color perception is insufficient to explain an actual encounter with color. Therefore, it appears that Mary is learning something new, with the justification that theoretical knowledge must be interpreted by the neural representation of visual experience for Mary to be familiar with a color. This idea creates new hope for supporters of reductionism. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay However, nothing was taken as an ultimatum; therefore, Chalmers' belief that scientific explanation only provides answers to the "easy problem" is still taken into account. Chalmers proposes the introduction of new psychophysical laws to eradicate the complications of consciousness. His first idea of ​​a fundamental psychophysical law links awareness to consciousness, such that the presence of consciousness depends on the presence of awareness. His final idea relates consciousness to information states in the brain, which appear as two different aspects of the same thing, i.e.