Over the years, Iraq, home to a wide range of ethnic groups, including Kurds and Arabs, has been ruled by many different powers. However, once the monarchy was overthrown in 1958, following Iraq's independence from the United Kingdom in 1932, the Iraqi Republic was controlled by the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party. In 1979, Saddam Hussein took power in Iraq and ruled for several decades. Throughout his rule, Saddam inflicted various forms of terror on the Iraqi people, such as mass murder, ethnic cleansing, and torture. Therefore, the Iraqi people wanted change. After the September 11 attacks in New York in 2001, the United States believed it could be the one to bring about that change. After considering Iraq a threat to international security due to its possible possession of weapons of mass destruction, support for al-Qaeda, and the dictatorial rule of Saddam Hussein, the United States led an invasion of Iraq in 2003 to remove Saddam Hussein. Although the United States made the justifiable decision to get rid of Saddam Hussein, it should still be held responsible for the Iraq War due to the impact of its lack of knowledge of Iraq's history and culture and poor judgment in use of policies to ultimately bring about change. led to war. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay After invading Iraq in 2003, the United States had a plan to rebuild the Iraqi government. This “De-Ba'athification” process, launched by the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA), consisted of removing all current positions of the Iraqi government, in an attempt to eliminate the power of the Ba'ath party, and replace it with a new Iraqi political system. The idea was to model the denazification of Germany after the Second World War. In theory, this seemed like the right decision to make in trying to rebuild the Iraqi government, but what the United States failed to recognize was that it was removing the only people holding the country together. This process completely wiped out all the people who had ruled the country and it was doubtful whether there were any reliable Iraqi leaders capable of taking power. On the other hand, this policy has affected many more Iraqis than the CPA had originally intended; the order was impacting the lives of the Iraqi people in ways the United States could not understand. For example, many families in Kirkuk province even struggled to feed their family members and pay rent. “However, what American authorities could not foresee was that once a repressive regime was removed, ethnic and religious tensions would erupt with unprecedented violence. Although these tensions date back to the dawn of modern Iraq, the chaos created after the invasion, the frustrations accumulated during Saddam Hussein's regime, as well as the influx of jihadists from neighboring countries led to their exacerbation." Due to the United States' lack of foresight on the issues its new policy would create in Iraq, its efforts to rebuild the Iraqi political system had already begun to sour. Furthermore, without any replacement of the removed positions of power, the new Iraqi government had no room to grow from the moment it was conceived. When the United States decided to help the Iraqi people rebuild their government, they immediately began acting without any prior knowledge of the history of the area or the cultural values ​​of the people living there.there, and with a lack of interest in learning more about the Iraqi people. Lack of interest in learning and failed reconstruction efforts damage the president's image because "the president, as commander in chief, is ultimately responsible for managing a war successfully." With this immediate disregard for influential aspects of Iraqi culture, it is completely understandable why many Iraqis wanted the United States out of their homeland. The United States has also shown signs of being unaware of some aspects of Iraqi history. For example, Dr. Arrington, a history professor, demonstrates that when the coalition forces allowed a group of Kurds to arrive in Kirkuk to occupy top positions in the city and protect the infrastructure, they should have known that the Arabs would have a problem with this form of “Kurdification” of Kirkuk and rebellion, due to the past history of Kurds being driven out of Kirkuk to make room for Arabs. This lack of knowledge led to some intense attacks by hundreds of armed Arabs against Kurdish sectors of Kirkuk on May 17. Aside from the fact that the United States showed signs of little knowledge of Iraq's history and culture, it also appeared to show a lack of interest in the issues of the Iraqi people. For example, during a visit to Iraq by Hillary Clinton and another US senator, Hillary Clinton spent time asking astute questions of the Iraqis, taking a sincere interest in their problems, while the other senator continually asked Council members Iraqi provincial: “You saw Sad Curse”. From this particular example, it is evident that the United States not only had little knowledge of what would actually benefit the Iraqi people, but did not even seem to care. To further explain this point, many American soldiers saw themselves as righteous warriors, killing evil and bringing justice, but this mentality brought terror and disorder and “never seems to be a concern for Iraqis who are killed and maimed by US troops” in to make America safer. They were so caught up in "bringing justice" and "serving their country" that they didn't consider what would actually benefit the Iraqi people. They were more concerned with how to benefit American citizens at home than with the actual people they were supposed to help. The United States sent the CPA to Iraq to help them rebuild their society. What they didn't understand, however, was that the Iraqi people did not have the same vision for the new society as the United States. The United States believed that the best thing for Iraq was to implement a democratic government, when in reality the Iraqi people had little to no interest in becoming a democratic society. What they really wanted was to be freed from Saddam Hussein's oppression and to have security. The Coalition had spent so long trying to build a democratic society through de-Baathification that most capable military personnel had been removed. With little to no effort to replace military personnel who had been removed, the Iraqi people enjoyed minimal security. With an increasing number of attacks by various ethnic and terrorist groups and sub-zero security levels, Iraqis were beginning to fear that they could be killed at any moment. Some even desired Saddam's return because the United States had approached problems in a way that “ranged from ignoring contradictory data and rejecting alternative perspectives to oversimplifying issues and applying a.