IndexAbstractLiterature reviewResearch methodologyConclusionAbstractA serious problem in today's world that has greatly increased the death rate in Greece is the carelessness resulting from texting and driving at the same time. Numerous accidents, some of them fatal, have been observed resulting from this problem. Furthermore, this phenomenon was observed more in the younger audience between the ages of 18 and 24. Although these types of incidents happen very often, there are no laws or severe punishments to reduce these types of actions. Using the questionnaire method, the following research paper will examine this problem and propose a solution to put an end to it. More specifically, starting from a large survey conducted among University students and other research already underway, this article will provide a detailed proposal on the ways that can limit and possibly eliminate the serious problem of texting while driving. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Literature Review Additionally, some nonprofit associations (e.g., the American Automobile Association (AAA), the National Safety Council, the Ad Council, Stop Texting and Driving (STAD)) and insurance agencies (such as Allstate, Liberty Mutual, Nationwide and State Farm) have created sites and supported promotional initiatives that warn drivers of the dangers of the messages, as well as asking people, workers and customers to sign promises to focus on uninterrupted driving. This problem has become so alarming that to date 41 US states have passed a law banning information while driving at the same time for all drivers, and some other states have introduced partial bans and limitations. Various academic reviews and government-backed reports have dismissed the problem of identifying the dangers of texting while driving. Regarding the physiological effect, reports suggest that using a mobile phone while driving delays drivers' responses as much as the blood liquor level or beyond the maximum permitted levels of 0.8%. Additionally, content information has been shown to correlate with the most significant level of potential disruption. For example, it is proven that drivers who video themselves or IM are repeatedly destined to get into an accident severe enough to harm themselves or potentially others. Additionally, using attractive reverberation imaging (fMRI), experts at Carnegie Mellon University found that mental movement is associated with driving reductions of 37% when using a PDA. Despite these risks, one study indicates that the same number of 75% or greater reports of drivers taking part in deviant driving practices. An ongoing report from Consumer Report (2016) reinforces these findings regarding texting while driving, while 80% of young drivers agree that combining texting and driving is dangerous, around a third of them admitted to having done in the previous month. Furthermore, Lee et al (2008) found that younger drivers are likely to continue with content information anyway, when tested with test driving circumstances. Predictable and with generally aided beliefs, respondents under the age of 25 report a greater likelihood of instant messaging while driving than more experienced drivers. Furthermore, according to this survey, the main reason behind sending an instant message (regardless of orientationsexual and age) was the level of importance of the message. at the same time driving. This growing flow of exploration is centered on a singular "impression" of danger, restlessness, foolishness and all outcome, impulsiveness and compulsion. For example, a test of college students conducted by BCA (2009) found that most users believe that texting while driving is fun and dangerous and that it should be illegal. Amusingly, most of the equivalents confessed to texting while driving, but in any case sporadically most of which confessed to doing so even while the travelers were altogether involved in other wild driving practices (e.g. veering into another trajectory, speeding and so on). Other studies on the topic suggest that the impression of danger may be a weak indicator of reading, responding or initiating writing while driving among young drivers, finding, for example, that this has prompted some researchers to suggest that young drivers in General will accept that messages relating to car accidents (and even overtaking) may catch the eye of others, but will not leak. However, using the theory of planned behavior, Nemme and White (2008) found that both social mental schemas and abstract standards were predictive of young drivers' content goals while driving. Collecting standards (e.g. the impression of their target groups texting during driving practices) and good standards (e.g. the apparent rightness/wrongness of conduct) added logical capacity to their model . Generally pertinent to the present review, three investigations to date have analyzed fear-based displays of passion and their effect on different types of driving practices. The study by Lewis, Watson, and White (2009) affirmed the relevance of psychological and enthusiastic segments of influential messages regarding spending practices. Even more explicitly, fear- and nervousness-evoked advertising appeared to influence both recognition and rejection of anti-spending messages. Additionally, members had to be convinced by the messages that they agreed to have the ability to sanction a valuable procedure that would reduce the presented risk of being involved in an expense-related car accident. Focusing on four risky driving practices (counting texting while driving), Lennon, Rentfro, and O'Leary (2008) observed the unintended impact in their investigation of coordinated feared interests in young drivers. Notably, in the wake of the fear-based BCA review intended to demoralize busy driving practices, members have announced an increased likelihood of participating in these Insafe trials. The authors stated that the low/moderate level of fear used in their investigation was perhaps not extraordinary enough to provide the expected results. From our description of the significant writing, it is evident that, although hostile to texting while leading special crusades, whites are pervasive in the media today. Almost no scholastic study to date has attempted to verify in an observational way their potential feasibility in changing the mindset and goals of drivers in a regularizing path supported by social advertisers. The investigations reported below were aimed at helping to fill this examination gap and identifying effective methods to discourage young drivers from driving. We previously conducted an exploratory survey today and modeled the intention and attitudinal and social measures and further look at the reasons why numerous drivers moreyoung people settle and lead, while others do not. Our goal was to validate the perceptions revealed in the media today and recognize factors that could possibly be controlled and further examined in open care claims contacts. A broad-spectrum test of drivers aged 18 to 49 was obtained from a line sheet (N=357). The normal age of the respondents was 24.9 years, as the guides of the members of other text messages while driving in exploration. Also, constant with an age range that is the ideal objective statistic for social advertisers in the current context. Statistical measurements showed that our sample was 51.0% female and 74.8% Caucasian /white (10.4% black/African American, 9.0% Asian American, 4.2% Hispanic, 1.6% other races/ethnicities). By geography, 31.1% of members reported living in the South, 25.5% in the Upper East in the Midwest, and 21.6% in the West, providing a significant cross-section of the country . Research Methodology Furthermore, describing the connection between moods, evaluative decisions, and conduct goals, the results of Study 1 offer evidence that the impression of an imminent threat differs across groups of people who expect to do so immediately as they drive later than people who don't. The reason for Study 2 was to decide whether and to what extent obvious cues (e.g., the inclusion of a skull and crossbones symbol) and/or verbal cues (e.g., a composed proclamation referring to death) in PSAs could be successful in changing respondents' behaviors and content goals while driving later. To provide additional insight to social advertisers looking to manage SMS while driving the plague, we also investigated whether “manipulative purpose” and members' ratings of PSAs influenced the observed results. Furthermore, we have seen that dangerous results are often connected with damage or passing away. In this sense, in our next investigation, we operationalized and verified this emphasis on dangerous outcomes regarding death/kicks in the sea. To do this, we drew on scripture identified with nature affecting mortality. Our presumption (tested observationally in Study 2) was that if appropriate mortality noticeability factors (i.e., advertising signs) were used, death contemplations and attractive outcomes in terms of attitudinal and social goals (i.e., mood states) could be evoked. increasingly negative feelings towards the conduct and expectations of content and guidance later) could be satisfied. In the current context, we argue that following exposure to a nature-striking mortality rate, the apparent severity of the risk presented by texting while driving will increase, as it is connected with the fundamental fear of death of a person. This observation should therefore stimulate one's inspiration to build a way of "surveillance" and, in this sense, reduce the apparent danger. Mortality affecting nature intentionally or subliminally pushes people to engage in activities to refrain from compromising behaviors that might cause them to bite the dust or to distract themselves from considering their own mortality. In imminent risk (as it should be for the situation or death/kicking the bucket), the apparent level or view (adequacy of the sale and feasibility of the reaction) will decide whether people use "terror control" or danger" to manage apparent danger. Just in case.