There is debate over whether the NCAA basketball tournament should be expanded, shortened, or left the same. As we make our decisions, we need to make sure we do everything we can to understand ourselves and what the future holds for tournament basketball. This essay explains my position against the idea that the NCAA basketball tournament should be expanded. It also elaborates on my argument against the idea that a major league player who uses steroids in baseball should be accepted into the hall of fame. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay We should not expand the NCAA basketball tournament as the competition is perfect as it currently stands. The number of teams must not be added. Expanding the number of teams would be like aiming a firehorse at a glass of Dom. It would make it diluted beyond recognition. Implementing the decision to expand teams would simply ruin the basketball tournament. The coaches might push for the basketball tournament idea to be expanded for their hidden agenda. They love the expansion as it gives them an easier path to the tournament. With the increase in the number of tournament attendances, coaches will be assured of job security and that is their happiness. Players on the other side would have the opportunity to extend their seasons. But from a practical point of view, the existing format of the tournament is almost flawless. What is perfect should not be interfered with and there is no need to use a jackhammer when a small chisel would suffice. Financially, the NCAA should always sell high, not low. The NCAA needs to understand the value of its product, wait until the economic times are right and also consult financial experts. Expanding the tournament would be like deciding to offer a unique oceanfront property on the cheap. A major league player who apparently uses steroids or bets on baseball should not be admitted into the hall of fame. First of all, they should follow the rules of baseball which may allow them reinstatement after some time. Major League players should not be eligible for the Hall of Fame until they spend time out of tournament play. Spending time outside the Hall of Fame would allow them to rehabilitate themselves and learn to work with the rules that govern the game of baseball. In the event that league players do not apply for reinstatement after the designated period, they should not be forever inducted into the Hall of Fame for failing to perform as instructed. Being involved in steroid use or gambling is an activity that stains the game, and major league players involved should not be admitted into the hall of fame. They must be able to live with the consequences of their actions. In fact, Major League players should voluntarily retire to avoid further punishment. Major League players proven to be involved in steroid use or gambling should be banned from the Hall of Fame so as to maintain the integrity of the game. Major League players who have been banned for life from the Hall of Fame will serve as an example to other players who will most likely be afraid to get involved in the activities. The ban will therefore play a crucial role in ensuring the integrity of the game. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay In conclusion, an expanded tournament would dilute the achievements of national champions. Plus, there's nothing not to love about the.