Julius Caesar was a ruler of the Roman Republic, who through his invaluable efforts transformed it into an empire. He conquered neighboring states to expand Rome. After gathering some men, he marched towards his enemies whom he treated with complete contempt in capturing them. He was so evil that he let some statesmen out of the water and eventually cut off their heads (White 345). I believe Caesar was a power hungry politician contrary to popular belief of a liberator. The only thing Caesar cares about is power and his reputation. He has just returned from killing Pompey and his sons. His reasoning only has to do with his ambition for power and glory. He would use his power to conquer Gaul and build a larger army to achieve his goal. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Caesar's successes include the expansion of local government with an increase in the membership of the senate. He also resurrected some city-states previously destroyed by rulers before him. They were ultimately given life because of his sentence. The city states would have been in control of Caesar as he rebuilt the city with government support. The government would finance cities so that citizens can have homes under its law. Caesar also gave citizenship to Rome's new citizens, furthering his program of good deeds. These acts, in my opinion, were public relations activities only to enhance his political and personal agenda to become a legend. He also reformed the Roman calendar for the benefit of the Romans (White 348). Looking more closely at these actions, Caesar was committing them to further his agenda of immortality. To do this, Caesar was able to make Roman leadership inclusive by expanding the government. Caesar did this to show that he cared about his citizens. First, Caesar's way of acquiring power is lethal. Suppose he was a people-oriented leader, he would have embraced diplomacy. But he was ruthless and did not respect people's fundamental rights. He staged coups from the time he gained power in Rome until he began expanding Rome into an empire. Caesar is said to have tried to bribe Pompey's soldiers to fight alongside him. Although Pompey was among his most trusted friends, he had the courage to betray him. With this, he went further and bribed Pompey's soldiers to stage a coup (Fuller and Fredrick). However he managed to escape amidst all this drama. He turned against his longtime friends for personal ambitions. Caesar conquered Gaul and built a larger army to overthrow the government with the intent of strengthening his leadership. Throughout all this drama, Caesar decides to select his most trusted allies to assume leadership positions on his behalf. He did not consider the wishes and aspirations of his countrymen, but expressed his ambition. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Caesar meets death by assassination due to a lack of compassion for his fellow countrymen. Pompey, who was on the assassination team, linked it as a liberation for Rome. This was to show that the country was in a dire situation in Caesar's hands. This describes Caesar's rule as a rule of killing. In conclusion, Caesar's reign was a challenge to the people of Rome. Under his government he always placed himself above the interests of the state. From this position we can say that.