IndexDevelopment of the theoryStylesConclusionThe event of the September 11 attack, says fireman Piciatto: "And then the noise started, and the building began to tremble, and we were all frozen.” Piciatto (2004) also goes on to describe the attack, motionless and still. For a man, no one moved, except to look up at the ceiling, to see where the noise was coming from fireman describes as if he could look clearly into the ceiling panels for a simple reason for the attack on the Twin Towers There was a dead silence, no words were spoken hero tells of this tragedy and shares that there was little or no time to put feelings into words, although there was time to reflect on what had happened Today, Muslims living in America experience problems and are described by some as terrorists after the 9/11 attack at the Twin Towers is one of many examples that can connect to FGT. Face negotiation theory describes how individuals of various ethnicities manage disagreements. The face indicates the flattering self-esteem found in all communication positions. This face is considered an emotional expansion of how one sees oneself. It is composed of people of various ethnicities who possess the sense of face, referring to a universal concept. The sense of face can differ in cultures around the world. When you interact with others, you continually make conscious and unconscious decisions regarding face-saving and honoring issues related to rational, work, and world issues. Although there were several theories to choose from in the textbook, I believe face negotiation theory is interesting when looking at conflicts and approaches from different cultures. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Theory DevelopmentTo illustrate, the chosen theory was created by Stella Ting-Toomey and describes the cultural and situational goals that shape communicators, movement in approaching and controlling conflict. Ting Toomey and colleagues believe there are three types of faces. The first is the self-face, the concern about how one may see others. The second type is called other face, the discomfort of the image of another. Finally it is a common face, it has concerns for both painted parts or concerns for the connection all together. Face is commonly referred to as the way a person wants others to see them. It also refers to how one wishes to be treated and how individuals treat others by engaging with the social assumptions of self-conception. In addition, there are several core beliefs related to centered theory. The first fundamental belief created by Ting Toomey is that people of ethnicities all over the world attempt to preserve and resolve facial communication in all disagreements. The second core belief is that coping is mostly difficult within emotionally frightening or helpless concerns when communicators' pre-established identities are then challenged. Then there is the cultural scope of individualism-collectivism and the dimensions of power distance, which shape the concerns and typologies of frontal work. The fourth focuses on the utility models of individualism and collectivism that shape members' preferences for self-oriented versus other-oriented situations. Fifth, useful power distance trends from small to large determine everyone's liking for horizontally focused frontal workcompared to vertically based frontal work. Sixth, in specific culturally constituted scenes there are elements of value coinciding with personal, comparative, and situational goals that influence the use of specific facial work actions in certain culture-bound scenes. Finally, intercultural facework skills concern optimal information assimilation, attention and matching techniques in controlling conflict situations based on helpless identification.suitability. According to Zang, Ting-Toomey, and Oetzel (2014), “conflict is essentially a process of face negotiation, but individual cultural value orientations and attributes shape one's self/other-oriented attitude and conflict behavior.” . Styles Not to mention The unrevealed impression of face negotiation theory is that face is a descriptive mechanism in various conflict styles. To begin with, emotional conflict is expected to occur within heterogeneous groups due to decreased barriers explained by those in-group with a diverse set of values, opinions, and linguistic systems acquired from different socialization encounters. When managing conflict, some argue that talking is an essential way to establish relationships. While others wish to highlight communication, it is likely to be successful when conflicting groups can and want to talk. Disagreements related to emotions, especially negative ones such as frustration and anger, can lead to dysfunctional team performance. Facework is a person's declared feeling of approving the image in the situation of social and comparative networks, and facework refers to the actions that individuals use to present their own face and to support or contest the face of another. Conflict is believed to be a process of face negotiation through which people experience the sensation of facing a threat or loss, frame positioned faces or identities, and perform facial work. It is important to note the key tenets of face negotiation theory which involves those from collectivistic cultures or others who see themselves as interdependent with self-definition, preferring to be mutually oriented by abstaining, accommodating and consolidating. Furthermore, people from cultures such as individualistic or independent in self-definition refer to the tendency to be more positioned and challenging. At the same time, self-construal also has a connection with face negotiation theory. This category represents a person's self-awareness of self-image traits, which can be considered independent or interdependent. Independent self-definition highlights originality, uniqueness, particularity, and inner characteristics, while self-definition emphasizes relationships, relationships, and social situations. This style has also sparked interest in the study of intercultural connection due to its ability to connect to both an individual's values ​​and behavior. There are also emotions and feelings related to face negotiation theory. Conflict is believed to be emotionally influenced and triggered. Confrontation with another individual can be seen as emotionally initiated and can be conducted in a positive manner. The uncertainty is partly due to the fact that speaking is not a circumstance in speaking or initiating linguistic observations – expressing one's thoughts clearly, referring to “group discussions” mentioned in other data. There is also a competitive style that contains an increase in self-concern and a decrease in a different concern. Zang,Ting-Toomey and Oetzel (2014) state, “this style is assertive, but not cooperative, prioritizing one's own interests and goals, representing an “I win, you lose” perspective” (p. 375). Career Field Additionally, communication within the medical field is key. Advances in communication within both the medical and human services contexts are recognized today. Within the healthcare field, physicians are required to continually communicate with a diverse set of individuals. A common goal in medicine is to provide successful healthcare to preserve, advance, and save individuals. According to Kirschbaum (2012), “face negotiation theory measures and explains how various elements contribute to conflict management style.” This type of style is evaluated by observing how one responds to situations involving conflicts between people. In addition, there are two goals that are often assessed in face negotiation data, classified as concerns and self-concept. Prior to theory, there are concerns such as inspecting identity conception problems that occur when linked to episodes of conflict. Conflict is an essential element for face negotiation theory. Studies often use three different categories that branch from conflict styles classified as dominant, integrative, and avoidant. It is important to note that none of these three terms reflect good or bad conflict management styles; rather, they are appropriate or not, depending on the situation. A section of medicine has taken control in leading communication education and training focusing on those who provide services in the operating room. This is understandable because communication problems that occur within the operating room can lead to conflicts or put patients at risk. Distinctive dependent differences present with both pilots and physician self-description. Not to mention that there are various communication variables within the culture. Inside the operating room there are different cultural behaviors such as strong motivation and independence resulting in idealism, invulnerability and avoidance of tiredness and stress. A pertinent example is that, when comparing doctors to pilots, it is preferable for doctors not to be asked questions by those below them. They also believe they perform the procedures even when they are tired. The findings suggest that recognition of strength among physicians follows positioning, self-governance, and indestructibility. Shared cultural behaviors are maintained within long-standing medical training. The observation of cultural elements focuses on communication problems within the operating room, doctors are used to solving medical situations. FGT evaluates and discusses the different factors that add to conflict management style. This style is assessed by observing how people react to situations that show conflict between individuals. Furthermore, the two most frequently evaluated objectives are data on face negotiation with both face concern and self-construal. The first objective, self-construction, brings the expansion of the various cultural dimensions to the sole level of analysis. The second objective, face concern, is studied by observing identity consideration problems that occur in connection with conflict episodes. Conflict style is an essential element in face negotiation theory. Researchers often use three types of categories including control, combine and avoid. The first category is described as a communication approach seen as unconventional, ambitious and.