Having a perfect society is a concept shared by many. The creation of an ideal society is on the minds of many, despite the population boom that exists in the world today. The concept of utopia is debated based on the ability of humans to create the world imagined in Utopia or to recognize that it is not a place, that it is only imaginable but cannot be realized in reality. There are a number of issues that tend to surround the concept of utopia, that is, economic equality for the entire human race, fair sharing of material wealth generated in the nation, and progressive development undertaken for the benefit of the country. entire human race. Utopianism is realized when a nation's social, political and economic development goals are achieved and there is equal representation of all people with everyone working towards the common goals of the goal of making the world a better place . Therefore, utopianism tends to adopt the socialist model of governing society as opposed to the capitalist model which is more inclined towards the benefits an individual receives from their work. This article discusses the concept of individualism, or the lack thereof, as a key component of the utopianism and utopian society experienced in popular culture. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay In reference to the book Looking Backward, Edward Bellary takes readers through the tale of a man who fell into a deep sleep before waking up after a few years. The changes depicted in the book are a representation of the changes that are occurring regarding technological and physical development that describe the idea perceived as ideal. Based on the book, there is the ideal life that the author describes as desirable, that of people retiring at age 45 and receiving full benefits, as the representation of a functional country that has a government that it is also functional and responsive to needs its citizens might have (Bellamy 33). The life the author wishes to live is one of opulence, where there is abundance within the country as anyone is welcome to have a meal at any of the existing public kitchens. Government ownership of productive capacity, which is pro-people, means that everyone has a fair share of the wealth produced by the state. Such a life would ensure that everyone actively participates in the development of the country and that there is no resulting income inequality. The working conditions that the author further describes are favorable to the general public. Those in media jobs have reduced hours they can work, to ensure there is decency and respect in what they are doing. Furthermore, the state's adoption of technology is an indication that it adapts to modern developments that have the sole purpose of improving human life. Based on the account given by the author, there is a general understanding that individualism is the least desirable life in utopia. The identity that people experience in the hypothetical scenario presented by the author seeks a collective identity as a community and not self-identity, as is the case in the current world. The concern and confusion the authors present in the book is how individualism might dilute the progress humanity has made in meeting each other's needs. The socialist life present in the novel is that of the 19th century, when the government has the passion to serve the people, a matter that the current generation cannot explain. The economic conditions existing in the modelindividualistic are significantly different from those desirable in utopia. That is, in utopia, everyone has a credit card where the amount of credit they could receive is absolutely basic and available to everyone. As such, there is no opportunity for humans to take advantage of each other to profit more than them. In individualism, there are social or economic structures that would put some people in better positions than their peers. Humans benefit from being able to acquire more wealth than their peers or subjects, and this may not bode well for members of society at the bottom economic rung. The book We by Yevgeny Zamyatin tends to bring out the differences that might exist in happiness and freedom. The message of the books is also a warning conveyed to the 20th century for the impact it could have on humanity, especially those who tend to subscribe to the ideologies it presents (Zamyatin 44). The fact of seeing people as numbers, as at the beginning of the books, is an affirmation of the primitiveness that exists in Russia, before the beginning of the individualistic model. The straight lines that delimit the boundaries in which humans must exist and the use of common identity through numbers are an indication of the benefits society receives from individualism. The message that the book conveys is utopian and a state of life that is imaginable and achievable once humanity can commit to having a common identity with each other. For example, shaving the head is an indication of the common identity that humans exude on their planet, which they might also duplicate for aliens, with whom they might interact. D-503's betrayal is a feat that leads to a chaotic scene and an imbalance of the status quo, which the community is striving for. In particular, there is the emergence of chaos in the current world due to the breaking of the windows that defined the previous life everyone enjoyed. The flow of birds into the One Nation is the beginning of the chaotic scene that defines the death of socialism and the entrenchment of individualism among the country's residents. Therefore, Individualism is described by the author as the book capable of bringing order to society. It also leads to an increase in greed and competition for the wisdom one might have over the other, without considering how it might impact other human beings. According to the book Tomorrowland, science is driven by science fiction. The book documents the behind-the-scenes intrigues responsible for technological developments in today's world. Technological innovations and science are believed to help change residents' lives for the better (Kotler 38). However, the book also highlights the negative influence that technology could have on the progressive development of society if used with negative or wrong intentions. For example, the production of biological weapons and the consideration of the use of life-extending medicines and life support machines could also have a negative influence on the lives of citizens. Biological weapons are described in the book as having the ability to alter the biological structure of the targeted organism, thus negatively contributing to that organism's existence. Often, such an effect could last for generations. Life extension technology serves to prolong an individual's life and further ensure that they lead a dignified life, especially when they are ill. Life-supporting machines go hand in hand with the admiration of utopia as one is expected to live for a longer period without the fear that one's life will be cut short. Kotler also agrees in the book that technology is the hope that would provide.