The Front Line is a useful historical depiction of the end of the Korean War that has both value and limitations, as it is from the Korean perspective that it therefore depicts the war as civilian and focused on trying to unify Korea. The director aimed to create a film that focused on the bond between both sides as a way to illustrate the attempt to unify Korea. In this way, director Jang Hoon fails to depict the war without prejudice in perspective, proving to downplay the international involvement and loyalty towards the South. Symbolism and contrast are combined with the downplayed war imagery to depict the war as a chaos the whose purpose is questionable. Because it focuses on the bond between both sides, some symbols of this bond are crafted in a way that presents the war in a historically inaccurate way, while also being criticized for how what it "offers as telling ironies are mostly cliché rusty." ”. The film depicts to society the impact of war on the humanity of people, sacrificed for hills that served as mere bargaining chips. If watched, you only see the end of the war, with no context behind why the war started, with limited depiction of foreign involvement in the war. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essayThe South Korean film was produced in 2011 by director Jang Hoon and depicts the last six months of the Korean War, which lasted from June 25, 1950. until July 27, 1953. It is considered a historical drama and takes place during an event and a real historical period, the Korean Civil War, which was the first physical war of the Cold War. Historical places such as Panmunjom, where the armistice was signed between the two sides in 1953, are used to represent real events that took place such as the conversations between both sides about the armistice. Surrounding elements such as war orphans, PTSD, and the constant shifting of control in the hills represent real historical parts of the war, the film being able to "reveal how impersonal military operations literally turn mountains into mounds." The film vaguely depicts the involvement of China, the United States, and the United Nations in the war, instead focusing on portraying the war as a civil war that was not part of the spread of communism as the Western perspective depicts it. Although it is set in a historical period, this film shows more about the modern perspectives on the war which is now seen from three different perspectives, The Front Line therefore portrays the modern Korean view on the war. The value of the director's choices in portraying the war are that he was able to portray the end of the Korean War for younger generations by focusing on the bond between North and South. Most of the previous Korean War films released focused about how the war began, such as the 2004 action film Taegukgi, but Jang hoon decided to release a film about the end of the war to "allow them to question the historical war and the current situation in the North". Relations with the South". It aimed to allow younger generations to form their own opinions about the relationship, so it depicts the bond between the parties to blame the difficulties of the war instead of both parties. Both are portrayed as struggling through the brutality of war, sharing the same view on how insignificant the fight for Aerok Hill is, as they lose understanding of why they are fighting such a war. In portraying the past in this way, Jang Hoondepicts war in a way that inspires “disgust for war and leaders who blithely send men into lethal combat,” through characters like the soulless commander brought to lead the company who blindly follows orders from higher up. This places blame on the leaders of the Korean War and illustrates all citizens and soldiers as victims of their orders. The director successfully allows younger generations to form their own opinions about the relationship between two countries by placing the blame for the war on the leaders involved. Jang Hoon faces limitations in providing context on the involvement and role of international countries in the war, as well as failing to direct without bias in favor of South Korea. Jang Hoon portrays America as an air force that “drops bombs indiscriminately on the battlefield,” portraying Americans as disconnected from the South and making the relationship between America and the South appear worse than between either side of Korea. America is barely represented in The Front Line, with only one American representative seen in the entire film, despite the prejudice towards the Southern military. The film includes a character who was an old war veteran who fought in the war against Japan, a reference to the nation that colonized Korea for thirty-five years, who was from the North but had deviated. This character harbored a deep hatred towards the North, introducing himself as "He's not red at all", the use of such a character who was from the North but fought for the South illustrating how the film is made with a bias in favor of the South, despite claims to illustrate the link between both parties. The director faces limitations as he failed to depict aspects of the film such as the importance of foreign armies fighting the Korean War and depicts sides with a bias in favor of South Koreans. There is value in the visual techniques and shooting methods used in The Front Line to depict the horrors of war. Opposing policies are represented in the scenario, as “the South Korean camp is bluish gray, and the North's are brownish orange.” Red is a well-known symbol of communism, blue is its opposite, such contrasting images representing the forms of political government of each party. The director wanted the battle scenes to "downplay the visual fireworks of war to express them as a messy, senseless pandemonium" while keeping the glorification of war to a minimum, portraying it as a grim mess. Jung Hoon makes sure that the true “uselessness of sacrifice is symbolized by the hill” on which all the battles take place, so that the senseless reasoning behind the war is represented in his film. The shooting styles also work to reveal the horrors of the past, shot first by a handheld camera with quick cuts, then by a still, fluid camera that made us feel "as if we ourselves were getting used to what happens around the personages". ”. This revealed how soldiers became desensitized to the merciless nature of war, quickly suffering from the sacrifice required. The techniques and methods used by Jang Hoon have value in how they work together to portray the nature of the Korean War. The techniques and methods used have limitations in the way they describe the relationship between the parties and in the use of the cliché of war. tropes. During the film, a box in a tunnel on Aerok Hill is used for the exchange of small gifts between some North Korean and South Korean soldiers, symbolizing the friendly relationship between both sides. This portrayal of the relationship is historically inaccurate, considering they were at war and are shown doing sokill each other in other scenes, the film follows the same "war is hell" concept seen in films like Saving Private Ryan. The box concept is therefore added for entertainment purposes rather than to accurately represent the war. The film also faced criticism for using character clichés such as the old war veteran and the frightened young soldier new to war. These clichés make it difficult to understand what kind of soldiers were involved in the war, nor do they allow us to add historical details, since “they are the standard characters we have encountered in countless war films”. The techniques and methods used by the director have limitations as a historical source in the way he ignores parts of the war to create a more interesting story. The Front Line depicts the inhumane nature of war. People brought out into the open by war by carefully illustrating the role of the hills on the 38th parallel during the Korean War. The Korean War, as wars tend to do, left soldiers suffering from PTSD, as well as feelings of undying guilt, depicted through the shell-shocked soldier who had forcibly forgotten that his troop had been annihilated, this is represented in Pohang's flashback. The scene shows the character Shin Il-Young having to shoot numerous South Korean soldiers so the others can escape, an inhumane action that leaves him addicted to morphine as he is unable to deal with the pain caused. Scenes like this and Suhyeok's death show society the inhumane nature of war, along with how interrupted forced actions leave soldiers, as Suhyeok says he believes he "died a long time ago", even if only on the brink of death in the one staged. The company constantly observed the struggle for Aerok Hill, which although not a real hill, depicts the fighting that would take place for property in the hills. It depicts the futile nature of the war which took place over the course of three years, most of the battles taking place in the hills whose only use was to gain influence over the opposing side. This film manages to portray how painful it was for those involved in the war as they were fighting a useless cause. The portrayal of the Korean War in The Front Line fails to illustrate most of the war on society along with foreign involvement. Since it focuses on the last six months, it is understandable that it does not show the war before the end, but by doing so it does not show the cause of the war to society, not to mention the fact that Korea was divided because of the Soviet Union. The Union and America want to maintain power in Korea after World War II, thus creating the 38th parallel. This shapes society's view on limited information about the war, therefore limited personal perspective given that the film's focus is on a specific element. The countries that aided each side are shown only briefly throughout the film, despite China being involved in the war before it began and America officially joining two days after the first attack on July 25, 1950. Although this is was done because of the West Considering that the Korean War was “a proxy war for the Cold War,” downplaying the involvement of countries and organizations such as the United Nations, presents the war exclusively from the Korean perspective, even though two other perspectives exist. The limitations in the representation of the Korean War in this film are linked exclusively to the end of the war and the Korean perspective. Please note: this is just an example. Get a personalized document from us now 30/05/2019, 2014.