The fact that God is defined as the unknown and absolutely different highlights the lack of ability to understand Him. God is capable of making himself understood by man through different approaches. The first approach is that He could create a unity through an ascent, in which He would draw the student higher towards himself and allow him to forget his misunderstandings. God can also reveal himself to the student, to whom the student owes Him everything, because he now understands the Truth that sets him free. However, these two options are rejected because they do not promote equality. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay For God to be equal to man, He must eventually descend and become a man Himself. In fact, he will appear "equal to the least of men", in the form of a servant. Yet another paradox manifests itself when God will appear as an individual who resembles everyone else. The problem arises: How can people understand God if they do not possess the ability to do so? The fact that God is defined as the unknown forces man to realize that he is unable to understand the existence of God. Thought is incapable of knowing the absolutely different, since doing so would invalidate it. The demonstration of proving the existence of God is nullified because it is impossible to do so. By calling God the unknown, it means that God exists subjectively. If an individual learns something about the unknown, then he will recognize that it is absolutely different from him. God is unable to make Himself understood because of His differences with man, since He has not committed sins, and man has. Individuals have been made different by God but they have made themselves absolutely different to the point of having no ability to understand it. Through God, man is able to know that God is different from himself, but, since he is incapable of understanding the absolutely different, the question arises: how could he understand the absolutely different? Evidently there is another paradox, for man needs God to know that he is absolutely different from God. This paradox "manifests itself as absolute" (47). If an individual stops trying to prove the existence of the unknown, then God appears. If they let go, then a leap of faith is present. God has become so different from individuals that they do not know him. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Indeed, proving the existence of something is difficult without prior assumption of its existence. Even if man wants to understand God, it is difficult because their absolute difference causes a rigid division between them. God employs many methods in attempting to prove his existence, including ascension and descent, and becoming the last of men, a servant. But God exists subjectively and cannot be understood by man because he has committed sins while God has not. God's efforts to reveal himself to man fail because of man's inability to understand the unknown. Man, who is ignorant of the existence of God, cannot conduct an examination to prove his existence without presupposing his existence. A paradox emerges considering that if man wanted to understand the absolutely different, then man would have to know that he is absolutely different from God, so he needs God to understand this. Without God, one must take a leap of faith in believing in his existence.