IndexThe Golden RuleHill's Christian Business EthicsNash Covenant Business EthicsImmanuel Kant's Categorical ImperativeUtilitarianism and Negative Utilitarianism by John Stuart MillVirtue Ethics (Aristotle)The four dimensions of corporate morality by DamoneReferencesEthical activity alludes to the activity that gives the greatest value to the most noteworthy number. This implies that a specific business should be able to give the best to countless people instead of a couple in the general public for it to be considered ethical. The essay analyzes seven ethical methodologies and provides a critique of the approaches: Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay The Golden Rule (one should treat others as oneself or wish to be treated), Hills Christian Ethics for Business (keys to God are also keys to business ethics), the covenant by Nash Business Ethics (focuses on both providing value and providing services to the organization's customers and employees and not on maximizing returns), Emmanuel Kant's Categorical Imperative (aims to evaluate moral actions and moral judgments ), John Stuart Mill's Utilitarian and Negative Utilitarianism (the theory differentiates the degree of good and wrong), Aristotle's Virtue Ethics (emphasizes virtues or moral character), Damon's Four Dimensions of Corporate Morality (provides the care in all aspects of company problems). The four dimensions connect the moral instrument to all aspects of company operations. The approach I appreciate the most is the golden rule because I believe that a person is able to evaluate what is wrong and what is right when he stands in the other person's place and thinks like the other person. Also, everyone wants to be treated well, so if a person thinks about how they would like to be treated and treats others equally, it would be the best way to maintain harmony in the organization. From my point of view, the theory is useful because it maintains the balance and mutual respect of human beings by treating others as we should be treated. The Golden Rule The Golden Rule is an ethical rule that recommends treating others as you or wish to be treated. It works according to the law of correspondence which expresses the principle "do unto others as you would have them do unto you", making it the most exalted guideline on earth. The rule has types and relatives that identify with it, for example, the silver rule, the platinum rule, the love rule, role taking among others. The rule is that an individual is a specialist and chooses the most effective method of treating others. The quality of the theory includes the demand for self-reflection and the appearance of being fine and believing in how one should be treated in an alternative circumstance. The theory may have worked in the social orders of the past, but in the various current social orders, individuals have specific therapeutic inclinations that they detest making it full of imperfections. The theory is also individualistic as it only works between one individual and another individual or group. The rule is not practical in a circumstance where conflicting needs and interests exist. From my point of view, the theory is useful because it maintains human balance and mutual respect by treating others as one should be. treatises.Hill's Christian business ethicsThe approach applies Christian ethics in the decision-making process. Hill explores various virtues of Christianity such as holiness, justice, and worship. He argues that these keys to God are also keys to business ethics. Use a three-way stoollegs to clarify the three virtues as the absence of values ​​will lead to a lopsided stool. Despite the three values, also consider the consequences of seeing whether justice has been served. The methodology has some strengths that are useful in complex business dilemmas due to its clarity without being simplistic. The three-legged stool is adequate for a single Golden Rule and less cumbersome than other ethical approaches. The weakness of the methodology is that it consists of understanding what is sacred, precious and only for the affected parties. It is also testing what incentive to give to a need when justice and love are in conflict. The methodology is useful in numerous contexts because it promotes these virtues that are essential for human life and the relationship between various individuals or groups. Ethical approaches keep employees within the company and decrease employee turnover. All things being equal, Damon's four dimensions of corporate morality apply to all business operations; henceforth the perfect way to deal with all dilemmas thanks to its four dimensions that extend into all areas. Nash Pact Business Ethics The methodology was advanced by Laura Nash in which she explains how self-interest-based business modes specific to corporate behaviors have not been widely done to incorporate ethical constructs into decisions made by the board. The methodology focuses on both the transmission of value and the distribution of services to customers and employees of the association and not on increasing returns. It also focuses on how the management should treat its employees: trusting and respecting employees. It increases collaboration between individuals and can stimulate business development by creating values ​​and building trust and respect between employees and managers of organizations. The methodology is used appropriately to generate trust and respect within organizations. Ethical managers approach their employees with respect and customers have also received a boost in pursuing the value of their money. I would use this way to improve service delivery proficiency within my association for common sense reasons and also to ensure the success of my business. I imagine this methodology will be significant in the consumer-centric office. Immanuel Kant's Categorical ImperativeMethodology is the focal idea according to deontological philosophy. It refers to the method for inspiration for a specific activity, and is an improvement on the Golden Rule. It aims to evaluate good deeds and good judgments. He uses three formulations to classify the good principles of judicious beings in which he talks about humanity as well as healthy needs, including "mastery needs." Kantian methodology has more weaknesses than strengths. While it can evaluate oral judgment and morality and presents an obvious way to approach ethics that many would like, the theory does not consider the consequences of an activity as utilitarianism does. It also does not consider that in some contexts two evils can confront each other, thus denying good agents their self-government. The theory has not been used expressly in situations where two evils are in conflict, thus presenting an ethical problem. Because this methodology does not consider the consequences of an activity, the universalized nature, and the difficulty of good self-governance by ethical agents, the methodology presents an increasingly significant weakness for ethical methodology. Utilitarianism and Negative Utilitarianism by John Stuart Mill Utilitarianism is a consequentialist moral theory that defines morality based on maximum expected utilityfor all parties involved in an activity or decision. Plant states that actions or decisions are correct in case they support the lion's share of significant profit. In opposition to Mill's predecessor, Jeremy Bentham, Mill argues that selective pleasures are praiseworthy, thus characterizing them (great) as general prosperity which can be traced to Aristotle's eudaimonia. The strengths of the theory are that it flies in the face of our instincts that harming people is not the right thing to do. It is easy to use because evaluating our negative and positive actions is simple, it is secular as it does not depend on beliefs about God and the theory is universal because it is based on the rule of utility: increasing happiness and decreasing suffering. In any case the methodology has its weaknesses such as incommensurability because you can assign values ​​to pleasure, right or wrong, it is a subjective theory because overall we have different perceptions of happiness. The methodology also does not consider the feelings of the minority. The theory is validly used in decision making because the majority perspective is believed to subsequently increase utility. Despite its effectiveness, the methodology sidelines the desire of the minority. For me it is essential in cases where there are rambling opinions and the requirement of a serious decision is mandatory. Virtue ethics (Aristotle) ​​The methodology emphasizes virtues or good character as opposed to duties and rules of deontologists or consequences of actions of consequentialists implying that it emphasizes individual character as a key component of individual inference rather than rules or consequences. The aspect that distinguishes the ethics of ideals from other ethical approaches is the centrality of goodness within the methodology. According to the ethics of righteousness approach, there are two or three forms that incorporate eudaemonistic righteousness, goal-focused, specialist-based ethics, and exemplary ethics. The theory hosts a number of strengths that incorporate the mapping of good reasoning. It does not depend on theories, it is based instead on personal advancement, improvement and the instillation of virtuous qualities. In any case, the methodology has weaknesses such as the inability to distinguish between good and bad actions, it does not unambiguously clarify where these virtues will lead, it is difficult to characterize individual reasons for good advancement, and it does not offer a distinct answer to moral dilemmas. it is used effectively to enable managers and leaders to question the type of individuals they should progress to become and how their actions will affect others within and outside their circle. The methodology does not have the relevance for ethical problematic situations which consequently are not suitable to deal with such situations. Damon's Four Dimensions of Corporate Morality The methodology describes the four dimensions of corporate morality that incorporate a generative methodology that relies on using the moral creative mind to produce inventive initiatives that exhibit respectable purposes. The second dimension is the empathic dimension which uses perspective taking and the golden rule to establish a strong collective union and relationship with the parties within an association: employees, partners, clients, customers and investors. Restrictive morality is based on restrictive practices and ethics designed to prevent harmful practices separate from simply disreputable practices. Finally, humanitarian morality which is linked to the beneficial prediction of sharing profits with justifiable causes. The four dimensions are the pillars of the methodology. Please note: this is just an example. Get a personalized document now come on., 26, 57.