Traditionally, cluster ability or intelligence has been examined in groups as a combination of associated degree of psychological ability or ability of individual members. However, a variety of studies and meta-analyses have indisputably found the correlation between average intelligence and team performance to be quite weak, particularly in field contexts. This may apparently be due to the loss of knowledge resulting from crossing search levels. To reinforce this concept, researchers recently explored whether or not intelligence exists at the cluster level, taking the same approach that psychologists have used for over a century in examining intelligence in people. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay In measuring intelligence for people, psychologists have repeatedly shown that a statistical factor emerges from correlations between individuals' performance on a broad type of psychological tasks. This problem is commonly referred to as “g” or “general intelligence.” General intelligence is conceptualized as an individual's ability to perform a broad type of tasks. Recent analyzes have examined whether or not a similar “collective intelligence” exists for groups of individuals. The researchers gave about two hundred teams a wide variety of different types of tasks and found that groups that performed well on one curated task type also performed better on all other tasks. an elemental analysis of the groups' scores revealed as a single, overarching, dominant problem explaining a disproportionate percentage of the variance, the aggregate of the groups' scores, consistent with the amount of variance typically explained by the primary consideration battery of the groups individual psychological tasks. They called this first issue “collective intelligence”. "It has therefore been shown that collective intelligence is capable of predicting the future performance of a team in many complicated tasks. Functionally, numerous groups are composed of individuals who have totally different information, knowledge and experiences and should share and integrate them. Collaboration is the art and science of sharing and mishandling information. Cooperative resolution of disadvantages requires groups to generate new information and create inferences that no single member of the cluster could have deduced in this regard, one could distinguish 3 forms of inferences: individual (generated by a team member), shared (generated by the cluster, which all possesses the information) and cooperative (new information that will be deduced from the information of individual members). Teams are more ready to generate inferences from information shared, followed by individual information, however they are less adept at generating collaborative inferences. One strategy to improve the standard of information shared during cooperative problem solving is to allow individual cluster members time to remember and internally record details of private expertise or observations that will later be shared with the cluster as a whole . Please note: This is just an example Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Another strategy that enhances cooperative problem solving is following a methodological script of gathering and sharing knowledge. This structured script or coaching program allows each cluster member to experience identical processes and problems, establishes time for individual and cluster work phases, and encourages..