IndexThe case of Baby Theresa: a complex ethical dilemmaThe definition of deathOrgan donationCharity vs. non-maleficenceEthics of organ donationAutonomyBeneficenceNon-maleficenceJusticeApplication of ethical principles to the case of Baby TheresaAutonomyBeneficenceNon-maleficenceJusticeLiving organ donation: complex ethical considerationsRisk - Analysis of benefitsInformed consentAlternative optionsConclusionThe case of Baby Theresa, a newborn born with anencephaly in 1992, has sparked a profound debate ethics regarding organ donation, the definition of death and the boundaries of medical intervention. This essay delves into the ethical dilemmas surrounding Baby Theresa's case, examines the ethical principles pertinent to organ donation, and carefully examines the complexities of living organ donation, with particular attention to risk-benefit analysis and undue influence. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Baby Theresa's Case: A Complex Ethical Dilemma Baby Theresa's case was a poignant example of the complexities surrounding organ donation and end-of-life decisions. Born with anencephaly, a condition characterized by the absence of a major part of the brain, her situation was medically disastrous. However, several ethical dilemmas emerged that required careful consideration. The Definition of Death One of the central ethical challenges in Baby Theresa's case was the definition of death. Traditional criteria for declaring death, such as cessation of brain and heart activity, presented a unique challenge. Little Theresa's brainstem, responsible for vital functions such as breathing, remained intact. This raised profound questions about whether she could be ethically and legally declared dead while her body continued to show signs of life. Organ Donation The next ethical dilemma revolved around organ donation. Little Theresa's parents, with empathy and altruistic intent, wanted to donate her organs, primarily her kidneys, to other children in need. This presented a moral conundrum: Is it ethically justifiable to sacrifice one life to save others, especially when the life in question had a limited prognosis? Beneficence versus Nonmaleficence Another ethical dilemma that arose was the conflict between the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence. maleficence. Charity, which emphasizes doing good, was evident in the potential benefits that could arise from organ transplantation. Saving the lives of other children through organ donation was an altruistic act rooted in the principle of charity. However, nonmaleficence, which involves avoiding harm, has raised concerns that organ donation could hasten Baby Theresa's death, potentially causing her harm. These principles include autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. Autonomy The principle of autonomy states that individuals have the right to make decisions about their own bodies. In Baby Theresa's case, autonomy passed to her parents, who had to decide what they believed was best for their daughter, given her condition. BeneficenceBeneficence, the principle of doing good, is central to the ethics of organ donation. Organ transplantation has the potential to benefit recipients by offering them the chance for a longer, healthier life. This is in line with the principle of beneficence. Nonmaleficence Nonmaleficence, or the duty to do no harm, became complex in the case of Baby Theresa. Although organ donation may have benefited others.