Bias is a pervasive and harmful social issue that has the potential to influence decision-making in various contexts, including the criminal justice system. In the classic film “12 Angry Men,” the character Juror 3 exemplifies the destructive nature of prejudice and its impact on the decision of a murder case. This essay will explore the bias exhibited by Juror 3 and its implications on decision making within the jury. By examining the character's behavior and attitudes, this essay aims to shed light on the harmful effects of prejudice in the justice system. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay The significance of this topic is especially relevant in the current context as discussions of prejudice, discrimination, and social injustice have gained considerable popularity in public discourse. Understanding how bias can manifest itself in the courtroom through Juror 3 representation is essential to identifying the need for reform and the importance of impartiality in legal proceedings. This essay will argue that Juror 3's bias significantly influences his or her judgment and threatens the integrity of the jury's decision-making process. Juror 3's Bias Juror 3's bias is evident in his firm belief in the defendant's guilt, despite the lack of substantial evidence. His personal prejudices and preconceived notions about the defendant's past and behavior cloud his judgment and prevent him from objectively evaluating the case. For example, Juror 3's hostile attitude toward the defendant, who he believes is of a lower socioeconomic class, reflects his prejudicial views. His insistence on the defendant's guilt is rooted in his distorted perceptions rather than concrete evidence. This demonstrates how bias can lead to a miscarriage of justice, as it distorts the interpretation of evidence and hinders fair deliberation. Additionally, Juror 3's personal experiences and unresolved emotional issues contribute to his prejudicial position. His strained relationship with his son influences his perception of the defendant, who reminds him of his estranged son. This emotional baggage fuels his prejudices and affects his ability to consider the case objectively. Juror 3's unresolved anger and resentment toward his son is projected onto the defendant, leading him to make unfounded assumptions and prejudicial judgments. This highlights the interconnectedness of personal biases and prejudices, which can have harmful effects on the legal process and the lives of those involved. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Conclusion The character of Juror 3 in “12 Angry Men” serves as a poignant example of the destructive nature of bias in the justice system. His biased opinions, rooted in personal experiences and preconceived notions, significantly influence his judgment and undermine the integrity of the jury's decision-making process. Juror 3's portrait highlights the need for impartiality and the detrimental impact of bias on legal proceedings. Moving forward, it is imperative to recognize and address the influence of bias in the classroom to ensure fair and just outcomes for all involved. Further research and support for reforms that promote fairness and mitigate bias within the justice system are essential to address this pressing problem.