Philosophy is a study that involves personal reflections and intuitions. With this, the claim that philosophy is a science is something that can be intensely debated even though the classification of any idea, subject or object is all a matter of personal preference and opinion. Points like this influence my Philosophy Manifesto and the tenants found within it. This short essay will provide as much information as possible about my personal beliefs and how they shape my overall view of philosophy in an academic sense. By the end of this essay, my goal is to express someone else's personal philosophy so they can see my perspective. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay First, my views on theism. I think I'm agnostic because I believe in science and most of its logical explanations. However, I began to discover that science cannot explain all of life's events and phenomena. Therefore, sometimes I might accept the religious explanation for some things. Because I am Chinese, I come from a background where most people believe in science or Buddhism. According to Adam Frank, Buddhism is one of the few religions in the world that usually gets the consensus of scientists who study emotions and the mind. So, there may be a reason why science and Buddhism have coexisted so well in my home country. Another thing that comes from my home country is the concept of Yin and Yang. Yin and yang is a concept of dualism in ancient Chinese philosophy and I learned it when I was a child. For this reason I agree with most of the concept, but it doesn't affect any of my personal decisions in life. The balance I see most in my worldview is the relationship between Philosophy and Religion. Some may think that philosophy and religion are more similar than not, but the truth is that philosophy is much more critical and analytical than its faith-based counterpart. Philosophy always seems to answer “how?” along with “why?”, “where?” and “when?”. More often than not, religion answers “how?” quite perfectly, but no one seems to question other aspects of history or faith. In my life, I try to live in a way that I feel comfortable with, while also following the laws and social moral codes that most people believe are right. When I think about how morality and free will intersect, I am often influenced and agree with the ideas that GWF Hegel was able to create. Hegel's theories and studies sought to find the marriage between the free will and desires of a potential criminal and the morality that surrounded them and decided that their actions violated universal law and the desires of the majority of the societies in which they lived. of this, my personal desires do not harm anyone, and I would never wish them to. For this reason, my actions should never be considered evil because universal laws say not to hurt others because it is not my property to harm their personal being and livelihood. My views on existentialism find me in agreement with Sartre in that one can create one's own meaning of life. I also agree with Camus because I don't live giving myself a well-defined meaning of life and continually questioning myself about this seems simply absurd to me. Part of the reason I feel this way is because my views on transcendentalism mostly agree with Kant in that reality and perception are equally important. This is because “Kant claims that space and time existsimply formal features of the way we perceive objects, not things in themselves that exist independently of us, or properties or relations between them.” So, reality is literally how we perceive it and plays with our perceptions to form our opinions. Likewise, few people realize that reality is something of their own construction, so their perceptions are often built around the influences of the people, ideas, and objects around them. For this reason I agree with Humanism and with the idea of ​​not accepting dogmas or superstitions; as the American Humanist Association states that all humans can choose to be good people within their own reality without religious dogma telling them to do so. Nicholas F. Stang has a long article on Kant's transcendental idealism and how it explains the marriage of reality and reality. perception. With this, marriage can be thought of as a truly equal partnership instead of a patriarchal system where one concept prevails over the other. However, Mary Troxel's work on Arthur Schopenhauer's philosophical lineage to Kant shows that reality and perception can function in the same way while also revealing that legitimate things are external to human consciousness. For example, Schopenhauer's view on aesthetics was that "the ability to consider nature aesthetically is the hallmark of genius and...describes the content of art through an examination of genius." After considering these points, I would say that the phrase “beauty is in the eye of the beholder” is very true as there will never be one standard of beauty. In this manifesto, the reason for this is that humans cannot fully understand concepts such as beauty because it is not within our consciousness and ability to do so. I am convinced that everyone can create their own destiny, even if they can. they are unable to control everything in their life. With this lack of control, however, they can manipulate their desires and efforts to live towards the destiny they have designed for themselves once life finally decides to bend for them. Hugh Rice defines fatalism as “the idea that we are powerless to do anything other than what we actually do” (Rice). Rice also writes that many people have a natural resignation to believe that life will give them what is meant for them. This is unfortunate, because the criminal should suffer no better fate than the priest, and the hunter should suffer no worse fate than the poacher. However, fatalism holds that whatever happens will happen, and I can't convince myself that this is the way life should be or play out. Quite simply, the key to all joy and happiness is living the way you love. I believe this act, loving someone other than yourself, is the key to happiness. Unfortunately, human beings cannot fully do what they want when they decide to love someone else. Love requires trusting and allowing someone to build trust in you. With this, you need to follow the rules created during the relationship. Sometimes, I don't have a choice to do the things I want, so I often try to make the best of it. With this, Frontiers writes that a research article shows that Chinese students often associate free will with happiness. So, ultimately, I may reconsider my position. However, as I said before, this should be the norm and not the exception; for having narrowly defined ideas and views on life is absurd and defeats the whole purpose of thinking for oneself. Saying this, my purpose in life is to always strive for a better life, to control most things in life, and most importantly, to be happy. My.