Internal quality assurance serves many purposes. An internal quality assurance has the responsibility to supervise different parts such as areas of improvement, student's progress, to maintain a good relationship with all assessors and employers and to comply with the policies of the center and awarding bodies. It is essential that the candidate is at the center of the entire quality assurance process as it affects the student journey. With this in mind, internal quality assurance must verify delivery performance and assessment accuracy. This can be done by talking to several candidates and evaluators and sampling the work of several candidates. The main objective of internal quality assurance is strict compliance with national professional standards and compliance by each department of the contracting body. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essayIf internal quality control discovers a problem or potential problem, it must address it as quickly as possible before it gets out of control, this could be a weakness of one of the members of the evaluation team or a trend that has already begun. Possible issues could include delivery issues, unaddressed learning styles, or candidates who are not making sufficient progress. Depending on the issue, the internal quality assurance might discuss it with the evaluator, or review the agreed objectives and modify them as the situation progresses and improves through continuous professional development activities such as standardization meetings and one-to-one meetings. As an internal quality assurance, I am responsible for ensuring that all assessors conduct assessments in the correct way and at the appropriate level. I will need to regularly sample candidates' work to check that it has passed to a satisfactory level. I expect all assessors to understand that a certain standard is expected and that this standard should be consistent across all levels. If I find that an evaluator consistently passes inadequate work, then as an internal quality assurance, I will have to intervene. The intervention I choose could be to observe the evaluator as he evaluates, review the evaluation plan and provide constructive feedback, and organize regular meetings so that evaluators can compare each other's good practices. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a custom essay Depending on the objectives of the action, it will influence which aspects will be monitored. For example, observing candidates in the workplace could be a problem. So the observations will focus on that, until it gets better. I must maintain the consistency, reliability, fairness and validity of the courses, as this is controlled by external quality assurance. If standards drop and sub-standard work is passed, the organization risks losing the right to offer that course. In turn, evaluators and other people associated with the course could lose their jobs.