Topic > Discussion of whether assisted suicide is morally acceptable

The doctor enters the waiting room with a dark look on his face. “I'm sorry, your son only has 2 months to live, the cancer is growing faster than we can cure.” This boy fought for his life for more than a year thinking he would survive, but now he is dying. His parents are devastated. Should he have the opportunity to end his pain and suffering sooner than God chooses for him? Every day people choose euthanasia to end suffering that contradicts religious views and morals, hurts the families involved and causes riots in other countries. As a result, many people in the United States and other countries are engaged in huge debates about what is correct. Euthanasia contradicts people's religious vision and moral beliefs. Euthanasia is putting families and friends in painful situations. Euthanasia has caused riots in other countries. Therefore euthanasia is wrong and not morally acceptable. We say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Euthanasia is defined as: “the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of irremediably ill or injured individuals (such as people or domestic animals) in a relatively painless manner on the grounds of mercy.” attributed negative connotations and is described as an “assisted suicide.” Euthanasia has been a subject of moral debate for many years, but today it has become more accepted in the United States. If people are not accepting suicide, then why is society becoming increasingly open to accepting euthanasia? Although these two aspects of life are completely different, euthanasia still involves the taking of life such a broad debate. When the cord is “unplugged” or a family member is lost due to euthanasia, such as the child who had two months to live, the family loses the time they could have had. God-given time that should not be taken for granted. In Christianity suicide is something that is not accepted. As research highlights, euthanasia is a form of assisted suicide. This, of course, is why euthanasia is such a huge debate within different religions. Christians believe that life is given by God and that no one has the authority to take someone's life even if they want to die. Birth and death were both given by God, so they should be equally respected. These beliefs show that life is given by God and should not end sooner than God gives them. People are said to be “made in the image of God”, so how can someone end their life when God made them live specifically for a certain period of time. Some Christians propose that if people choose euthanasia for an individual or for themselves, they are essentially saying that their lives are not worth it. Any life given by God should not be taken sooner than He has chosen for that person. In the Bible, one of the Ten Commandments says: Thou shalt not kill. Euthanasia kills. Doctors are starting to realize that euthanasia shouldn't really be an option. Doctors are becoming more understanding about giving people the choice of assisted suicide. A chair of the Medical Ethics Committee of the Christian Medical and Dental Society, Dr. Thomas Beam, points out that, “While the act of physician-assisted suicide appears compassionate on the surface, it is often patient abandonment at its deepest.” . needy time. Instead of support, the patient may find aloneconfirmation of the desperation of his condition and medically assisted suicide is legitimized as the only "way". This shows that even doctors see that patients may even think that euthanasia is the only way, when a miracle or something big could have happened. If one has morals, then one will understand that euthanasia should not be an option. Euthanasia is suitable not only for various religious debates, but also for moral debates. Morals are usually acquired based on religious beliefs, but even non-religious people are debating whether it should be something available. Some people say that every person has the right to choose when to die, but how can people who have moral beliefs against suicide think that it is ok? In a recent survey of moral attitudes, 18% of people who responded said suicide was “morally acceptable” and 53% said they accepted “physician-assisted suicide.” The main question of this survey was: Why did people think regular suicide was wrong, but not so many thought doctor-assisted suicide was wrong? Many people think that assisted suicide or euthanasia is not suicide. Autonomy does not give anyone the right to take their own life, nor does it allow others to make that decision for them. In other countries, some people don't even have the option to choose euthanasia. All over the world, people suffer from terminal illnesses. For many people, euthanasia is not an option. In many countries euthanasia is illegal. Many leaders in other countries truly believe that euthanasia means taking one's own life, in the sense of suicide. In Belgium it is legal for consenting adults, but children with terminal illnesses cannot have this option. Adults can only decide by themselves, the decision cannot be made by a second person. Children in Belgium do not have this option, which causes huge debates. Children today are much more intelligent than in years past, but no child would ever simply say, “I want to die.” The Belgian legislature is trying to pass a law under which a child could end their life by euthanasia with a parent's consent, or the parent could make the decision for the child. No child wants to suffer, but how can a parent choose to pull the plug on their child who may live into adulthood? Parents want their children to live a long and healthy life, so why should they risk getting that? Just as parents don't want to see their children die, people who have pets don't want to euthanize their pets. Euthanasia also involves “culling” animals and people if you don't believe they can cope. People have certain emotional attachments to animals just as they do to other people. When they have these attachments and “have to” put down their dog or other animal, they end up suffering. This suffering could have been delayed. Animals are culled for various reasons. Some of these reasons are that an animal is a shelter and cannot be cured, and another is that an animal has a certain disease that will not give it much more time in its life. It was recently discovered that PETA, an organization that is supposed to help homeless animals, has killed over 36,000 animals since 1998. You shouldn't kill animals in the first place, let alone homeless animals. The Virginia state inspector compared PETA's shelter to a euthanasia clinic. How terrible is it? Dogs and cats are killed because PETA doesn't "have room" or doesn't want to care for these animals. It is absolutely immoral. The cost of killing animals should also play a role.