A tumult of conflict has developed over the name of an NFL football team, the Washington Redskins. While the controversy has been less public for years, the issue was brought to light by a Native American activist. The activist called for the team to lose the right to its name due to its racist slur against Native Americans. However, Dan Snyder, the owner of the Redskins, bluntly refused to change the name. There have been many changes in society in the 21st century and the recognition of discriminatory activities is certainly part of that change. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay The Washington Redskins team name could be considered offensive to Native Americans. Not only the name, but the logo is clearly related to Native Americans. Some argue that the term “redskin” is just as derogatory as the N-word towards blacks. Both terms have histories that are not meant for casual conversation. Unfortunately, the N-word is used almost as an everyday greeting. The mistake is that ordinary people's language is changed casually and without thinking. Red Indians should not be subjected to the same fallacy and implemented in communication between people because there would be no progression of society through the ages. But what draws the line between offensive and inoffensive when these types of problems arise? While it is clear that the football team did not have the best name chosen, one possible factor could be that there is too much exaggeration about the whole debacle. Canucks, Vancouver's hockey team; that's a nickname. The same goes for Canadians.[1] Other teams have not changed their names even though it makes fun of a certain group of people. A small percentage fighting an entire population may not be enough to replace things that have been going on for years. For example, the Yankees will not change their name because someone says it is offensive and others may not agree with them. However, the term “redskin” may be a representation of courage and strength in the eyes of some others. There is a boundary between what is accepted and what is not, but no tie-breaking criteria is stated. Therefore, confusion constantly occurs, which creates all these disputes. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay The Washington Redskins should not be forced to change their team name has been around for at least 80 years. If there were no problems then, why are people asking for a football club to review its precious name? The word, redskins, is not related to the skill the team displays through its games. Dan Snyder stated in a letter to fans that the name was never a label. It was, and continues to be, a badge of honor... It is a symbol of everything we stand for: strength, courage, pride and respect...[2] Over the years, the team has proven itself worthy of being connected to Native Americans in a positive way. The fact that redskins is a derogatory term is true, but it has grown into something more than it was in the beginning. Therefore, the Washington Redskins should not change their name.