I believe that Nazario decided not to finish the story when Enrique was reunited but instead the chronicles afterward because he wanted the reader to experience the true story of the children who are reunited with their mothers/fathers. Since Nazario included this, the story becomes more emotional through the ending. For example, the text reads, “Belky always got more from you,” it says. If he was destitute, he had no one nearby who could help him. “How could I ask you anything?” asks Lourdes. “I would go a year without talking to you. " He tells her he wanted to study, he just didn't want to have to ask his mother for money. “Belky is going to be a professional. Look at me,” he says. Enrique tells Lourdes that his biggest mistake was getting pregnant a year after arriving in the United States. “You shouldn't have gotten pregnant until you knew your existing children were okay,” she says. Why did she keep promising to come back for Christmas and then never show up again? Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original Essay Once she knew he was in trouble sniffing glue, he asks her, how could she stay away? “You left me, you abandoned me,” he tells her. “You forgot about me. Nothing, he tells her, has been gained by their long separation. “People come here to thrive. You have nothing here. What have you accomplished?" If she had stayed in Honduras, he would have fared better. “I wouldn't be like this if I had had two parents. “A real mother, she tells Lourdes, is not that person who carries you in her womb. It's someone who raises you and feeds you. “My mother is my grandmother María,” he tells her. He warns Lourdes that she has no right to give him advice. “You have long lost the right to tell me what to do,” he says more painful. He tells Lourdes that he intends to leave her and return to Honduras within two years. “I will not do like you: I will stay here all my life”” This is an example of a dispute between Enrique and Lourdes, about the money she sent him . This example explains the terrible relationship Enrique had with his mother, after he arrived. I think the meaning of the statement "a powerful flow that can only be addressed at the source" means that I think the author is using metaphor. of a flow or river to describe the power of immigration from Mexico. The author believes that to engage with the enormous issues involved, governments must go to the source of the flow that begins in Mexico. Here you can find all the reasons, potential fears and dreams that fuel this flow of people flocking to America. The text reads: “María Enriqueta Reyes Márquez, thirty-eight years old, from El Campesino El Mirador, climbed the cross. He says he saw that a bullet had shattered a bone in the girl's arm. “It's like they beat a dog,” he recalls, his eyes filling with tears. “They treat dogs better than that. They don't punish criminals, but they beat these poor people. Why? Why?”” Or, another good example is: “The police gave chase. Citizens say the officers started shooting. Please note: this is just a sample. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay A bullet hit a Honduran girl, seventeen or eighteen years old, in the arm. She was eight months pregnant and said she had been raped by a policeman in Chiapas. These make sense as evidence to support this because these shootings or people being raped or even people dying of starvation or food, they only end when people stop trying to cross the border. That's why the author used the words “. . which can be. ”