It is clear that marginalized groups in society face injustices in their daily lives and when institutions in positions of power are given the opportunity to correct these injustices it is vital that they take action responsibility measures necessary to ensure the advancement of equality for all. Justice is a fundamental principle that has a direct impact on all areas of life and is fundamental in the evaluation of social policies and public institutions. Therefore, it is crucial to decipher why social standards dictate that certain practices are right, while others are not. Justice is a sense of fairness that is ultimately decided by the collective morality of a society. Injustices are evident when a person is not given the same opportunities as others, which is inherently unfair. The connotation of the word varies from person to person, but it is crucial to understand these differences because what justice means to a person illustrates how they think society should function. The world is full of natural inequalities, and a just society takes the initiative to level the playing field by attempting to correct disparities between individuals. The case of the little girl who fails to retrieve her lunch tray is a clear example of injustice, firstly because the school did not take corrective action and, secondly, the height of the counter was not designed to be inclusive for all students. to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay A good way to look at injustice is to contemplate the treatment of disabled people in society. Two key aspects of injustice are first the treatment of some people as inferior on the basis of irrelevant characteristics; second, the simple failure to correct for disparities between individuals based on irrelevant factors. The best working definition of justice exists only in the parameters of fairness. While it is nearly impossible for society to provide equal experiences for people with disabilities, it is vital that society provides equity. Equity for people with disabilities is a crucial exercise of justice in the society in which we live. Since the very essence of justice is subjective, one can accurately examine the legitimacy of injustice only in relation to the collective conscience of society. It is evident that in the United States the government has seen fit to pass laws to ensure fairness for people with disabilities. The request to make the lunch tray accessible to students would have some precedent when considering other changes such as wheelchair ramps, which have been made nationwide to ensure accessibility and safety for people with disabilities. The need for reasonable solutions arises from the widespread difficulty of equally accommodating human variations. This vision of justice requires a positivist approach in which people have the right to help secure a certain right if they cannot acquire it themselves. This means that disabled people have the right to the same opportunities as others, including the necessary measures to ensure these opportunities. A reasonable criticism of this definition of justice might be to ask: where does this right to equal opportunities come from? How can social definitions of justice impose an obligation on an individual, or an institution for that matter, especially when it might represent a burden? Sure it would be nice if every student could reach the lunch tray, but is it necessarily a student's duty? school to ensure this? Yes.