Topic > Critical response to Kant's moral philosophy

We all know that people behave in a way they call moral at least once, morality is thinking that we do it and talk about it, so what is the best way to try to do it understand. In this topic I write about how he is trying to show us that we perform actions for moral reasons. How should we act, what is right and what is not, as Kant wants us to think? Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essayThe only good thing without reservation is Goodwill, the will to do the right thing, everything else can be used for good or bad but the will to do good is always good, consider a bartender who finds a new customer, he can give him the wrong change and save some money but he didn't give the right change to the customer, in this situation Kant wonders why he did it, if he did it because he was afraid of being discovered or simply because it made him happy, well then that's not a truly good action because it wasn't motivated by good will, it was motivated by the desire to achieve something else, for Kant it's not the consequences of your actions that matter as much as the you do for the right reasons, the only truly good actions are those you do purely out of respect for the moral law. Doing what someone else tells us to do may not be good because whether it is God, parents or anyone else if we are simply following orders we are not acting out of good will we are only acting in anticipation of some reward or punishment, good will must come from us that's why moral reasons are so powerful and have such resist is because they actually come from us. Morality is a system of rules that we impose on ourselves, respect for the rules comes from being a member of a group, so I respect the rules of fencing because I am a professional fencer, I respect the rules of my country because I am a citizen. To be able to listen to reasons is to be rational, and Kant thought that part of being able to do this is that there are some reasons that we cannot ignore and that apply to everyone. Kant is not saying that we should only do something if we want to. it's okay for everyone to do it, that's not what he's saying, if everyone stole all the time the world would be a crappy place to live in but that's not why I can't think we shouldn't steal he says we should only act if it makes sense for us to do this we want everyone to act the same way, for example lying, sometimes we may want to tell a lie but living in a world where everyone is constantly lying will destroy the concept of truth, no one will trust each other and in this way world I don't want to lie because it wouldn't bring me many advantages. First of all I disagree with Kant in saying that you can never have a good reason to act immorally because it is possible to make an immoral choice for moral reasons for example, if you lived in Nazi Germany, it would be fine. Does it make sense to lie about the position of people hidden from an official who would like to exploit or kill those people. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get Custom Essay Second, I agree with Kant that blindly following people's orders cannot be a good thing because we do not act with good will but on the other hand if we understand and agree on what the other wants what we do, then in this case it can be a good thing.