Topic > Nuclear Energy as a Solution to the Global Warming Crisis

Have you ever worried about dying from nuclear energy? Nuclear power is when nuclear energy is used to generate heat or electricity. Nuclear energy has been an extremely controversial topic as to whether and when it should be used. The government has made drastic decisions about whether to use it. There have been many debates about how nuclear energy can be used to stop global warming and how global warming should be stopped. The government's use of nuclear energy is a bad idea because it will have a serious negative impact on health and it will have a serious negative impact on finances. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Nuclear energy should not be used due to negative impacts on physical health. For example, according to “Nuclear Energy is Not a Solution to Global Warming,” written by Alan Robock, “the risk of catastrophic nuclear accidents has been drastically underestimated. Nuclear reactors are built, operated, and regulated by humans, and humans make mistakes. Accidents can occur not only from collapses, but also from earthquakes, tsunamis and plane crashes." This quote expresses how humans create the man-made accidents that happen to them. They would normally unintentionally hurt themselves or others around them. Having people working on nuclear energy is physically dangerous and if a natural disaster were to occur everyone would be at high risk. Another example is in “Should nuclear power be part of New York's clean energy mix as the state fights climate change?” written by Chris Bolt and states: "expressed concern about all the ways produced in nuclear power plants: "you will have low and medium level radioactive waste from the metals that are near the reaction chamber, now sometimes this waste is thrown into communities poor. And we don't worry about the storage of highly radioactive waste, which is still a problem and is not yet a good solution." This quote expresses how professionals, instead of putting all the radioactive material they use into poor communities, might even put it into the oceans we swim in and how the ways they put it into poor communities puts their health at risk. absolutely no choice. Furthermore, nuclear energy should not be used by the government to solve problems because it would have an extremely large impact on finances. For example, in Nuclear Energy Is Not a Solution for Global Warming”, written by Alan Robock it is stated: “It is not feasible for McQueen. Nuclear energy is extremely expensive. It could not even exist in the United States without massive government subsidies, including accident insurance.” This shows that nuclear energy is expensive and the government will have difficulty affording it. As well as the drastic increase in demand for money from insurance companies for all accidents caused by nuclear energy. Another example is in “Nuclear Power Needs to Double to Curb Global Warming,” written by Bobby Magill, which states: “Another perspective came from Jessica Azulay of the Alliance for a green economy. She is concerned about the finances of nuclear power, which is more expensive than traditional energy sources. He claims that helping people “change light bulbs, change efficient refrigerators, make their homes more weatherproof… will give people a lower energy bill in a more affordable home.” An expert's show where he talks about another way the government.