To know whether the sociological and economic objectives of the country have been achieved in the last 25 years through sociological jurisprudence, we must first know about sociological jurisprudence. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original EssayLaw is considered a social fact or reality to shape and change society to meet its needs, expectations and goals through law in the sociological approach. The supreme concern of law is to consider the interrelationship between law and society and the study of community and social phenomena, group or individual interests and their realization and fulfillment. Most jurists will define law in relation to society in terms of the ends that the law serves, the interests that the law satisfies, and the common good that the law seeks to achieve – If the law is made to implement control and social change in society, then they are brought together as jurists who belong to the sociological school of jurisprudence. Sociological jurisprudence is nothing but a functional study of law that is applied to existing social problems in order to make law an effective tool of social control to satisfy the conflicting interests of individuals in society. The law has broader suggestions and also includes judicial decisions and administrative processes used to unify people's competing interests. It is for this reason that sociological jurisprudence has also been called functional jurisprudence or interest jurisprudence or social engineering jurisprudence. The characteristics of sociological jurisprudence are as follows: Sociological jurists are more concerned with the functioning of law rather than the nature of law. law. They viewed law as a reliable source for making judicial and administrative decisions and processes rather than as the theoretical content of reliable precepts. Law is considered a social institution by social jurists because they believe that law can be enacted deliberately and can also be changed. , modified or retained at any time or based on experience. In other words, it synthesizes both the analytical and historical approaches to the study of law. Sociological jurists place emphasis on the goals, objectives and social expectations that the law subjects rather to the sanctions and coercive character of the law. Sociological jurists look at the legal approach to institutions, doctrines and precepts in a functional way and consider the form of legal precepts as a matter of means only to satisfy the greatest good of the greatest number of people. The main goal of sociological jurisprudence is to solve the immediate problems of society with legal or extra-legal tools and techniques that promote agreement and stability of society's interests. Furthermore, the training of sociological jurists also rejected analytical and historical jurisprudence because the concept of jurisprudence considers law as a tool serving individuals in society. I feel that the sociological and economic goals of the country are being realized and most of the goals are realized in the last 25 years through sociological jurisprudence. India is now adopting new laws and there has been a change in the perspective of the law itself. In our country the main objective of the law is to consider the needs of society and also the interests of the individual. The law is made based on the situations found in society, unlike before 25 years.