Should college athletes be paid? The intensity of the discussion to pay college athletes has increased in recent years. Imagine a world where every college athlete was paid by their schools to play. The controversy that would have on an organization like the NCAA. There are many questions regarding the benefits of paying college athletes and not. Questions like: where would the money come from, is it paid the same for different sports? Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay There is no doubt that there are some disadvantages to paying college athletes. Almost all college athletes are on scholarship. They help pay for a student's schooling while he plays the sport he plays. If scholarships were taken out of the idea and only stipends were distributed, then you would think it would be more cost effective. If they gave students a stipend, that would lead to them paying taxes. After that, depending on the athlete, the fees could be high enough to the point that they no longer earn anything and cannot pay tuition. Payments would not be a good idea. Athletes would be forced to commit to the college or university with the highest offer. Ultimately, they would transfer the following year due to a higher offer, which would be a huge financial step for those schools. A scholarship is best for college athletes, as they purchase what they need rather than what they want. Before you know it, college sports will 100% be a business. That said, that activity could lead to a decline in other university programs. College sports money comes from these programs, meaning less popular programs would unfortunately be booted. This could potentially deprive students of the chance to gain a proper education and experience in the college they attend, as their necessary program is cut. If this ever happened, it would be even more difficult for non-athletic students to get the right care for their desired major. Those who typically argue against paying college athletes say it would change the nature of college athletics. Realistically, playing sports in college is difficult. Even if there are hundreds of players on the pitch, it doesn't mean they made their way there easily. And that goes for any sport, you have to be able to participate in it at a higher level than in high school. It's hard to earn a spot on a team. It's a dream many have to go pro, sports analyst Dave Anderson says about 7 percent of high school athletes make it to the next level. Another 2% of these athletes reach the Division 1 level. For college athletes, it's not just about playing the sport. The key word in college athletes is college. These students are expected to get good grades to remain eligible to play along with earning a college degree. If a student athlete is not maintaining adequate grades in his or her classes, it could have an effect on playing and managing the discussion about an ideal scholarship. Although the educational attainment of college athletes has become a major concern in the United States, little research has been conducted on the relationship between participation in college sports and educational attainment. We studied more than two thousand athletes over 10 years at a major Western university and found that the athletes were less prepared for college and had.