According to the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution, every American citizen is protected from cruel and unusual punishment in the criminal justice system. Throughout history, there have been many court cases that have ruled against or in favor of the death penalty, but the question of whether capital punishment is morally right or not is still debated today. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original Essay As a culinary arts student, I am in favor of the death penalty as I consider it a good form of punishment as it deters citizens and prevents criminals from committing violent acts, it is an extremely cheap financial method of punishing criminals which states righteous living and provides punishment to victims and their families. An opponent of the death penalty on this argumentative platform might refer to Furman v. Georgia Supreme Court. In Edward Koch's essay, “Death and Justice,” he points out that many people argue that the confiscation of any life diminishes the value of life itself, and no price should be placed on it. Despite all the opposing arguments that criminalize capital punishment, society cannot ignore the fact that by executing dangerous murderers we make it impossible for cruel people to commit violent crimes again. As American citizens, we should understand that the amendments to the Constitution guarantee rights and protections for every individual citizen, and that the death penalty works to uphold America's constitutional foundation of liberty and justice for all. This appellate case succeeded in abolishing the death penalty in 1972, holding that all current methods of execution, such as hanging, electrocution, and the gas chamber, were forms of cruel and unusual punishment. Some victims disagree that the death penalty was abolished in 1972. In my opinion, the “eye for an eye” mentality can be morally justified, according to their religion or spiritual standards. Instead of attempting to implement new laws based on ambiguous religious scriptures, spiritual opponents should first be informed of all the rules established by Supreme Court cases that clarify how capital punishment upholds all human and American rights. By carrying out death sentences, the government is able to prevent serious criminals from killing again and warns citizens that they could receive the same punishment if they commit brutal crimes. This point of view is understandable, but it does not take into account the fact that the government has different rights than individual citizens. It is irrefutable that the death penalty is cheaper than incarcerating threatening citizens for life, and by putting such treacherous human beings to death, we improve the quality and value of life for society. Many current arguments against capital punishment, such as Bright's, provide examples of outdated death penalty cases that have sentenced children, the mentally ill, and self-represented defendants to death. One of the main goals of punishment in the criminal justice system is retribution, which means the punishment is equal according to the severity of the crime. This structure ensures that outraged or mentally ill defendants will not be executed because they could not adequately represent themselves. No matter what a person's spiritual denomination, she or he cannot deny that the death penalty is the only humane way to adequately punish murderous criminals. (United States of America) Because of this clause, many Supreme Court appellate cases throughout history have been argued and established standards justifying the death penalty anddefend the rights of citizens. After this amount is multiplied by the number of dangerous inmates serving life sentences, we obtain It is economically logical to use capital punishment in the correctional system, which costs taxpayers only $86.08 per lethal injection. This ruling protects citizens' constitutional rights and establishes guidelines on the death penalty that guarantee respect for the dignity of each defendant throughout the penitentiary process. The death penalty penalty is not murder, because it is not a violent and immoral act, and is carried out in the best positive interest of society. This discrepancy proves “problematic” for both sides of the religious arguments because Westmoreland-White and Stassen assess that “the original context of the Sixth Commandment neither requires nor prohibits capital punishment.” Koch reports that spiritually-based arguments often reference the Ten Commandments and the teachings of Jesus in the Bible. In 2002 and 2005, the cases Atkins v. Virginia and Roper v. Simmons have banned the execution of mentally ill or developmentally disabled offenders, as well as offenders under the age of 18. In their essay “Biblical Perspectives on the Death Penalty,” Westmoreland-White and Stassen state that the sixth commandment has been translated as “Thou shalt not kill,” as well as “Thou shalt not kill,” in different languages. Mainly, the case Gregg v. Georgia in 1976 established that the death penalty, carried out by lethal injection, was a legal sanction because it required that defendants facing capital punishment be afforded the opportunity to appeal at any time during the judicial process. divided into trial and sentencing phases, and during the trial both mitigating and aggravating factors that contribute to the guilt or innocence of the accused must be presented. Religious supporters and opponents of the death penalty tend to argue for specific Bible quotes, but throughout their essay, Westmoreland-White and Stassen reiterate the well-known fact that Jesus' teachings and Bible verses should be interpreted as moral directives "proverbs", not as literal "laws". However, others, like Koch and me, argue that funding the well-being and livelihood of convicted murderers is far more reductive and shameful to the quality of human life than if such monsters were simply put to death. How can the families of the victims live a peaceful life, knowing that their tax dollars are being used to ensure a healthy, comfortable and long life for the person who killed and stripped their loved one of human dignity? The capital punishment requirements outlined by the Supreme Court allow victims and their families to know that justice has been served for the despicable crimes committed against them and relieve families of any blame, knowing that the criminal has been punished humanely and fairly. According to a 2012 survey by the Vera Institute of Justice, keeping a criminal in prison costs taxpayers an average of $31,286 per year. Direct biblical sayings of Jesus Christ such as "all who draw the sword will die by the sword" and "love your enemies and pray for your persecutors" (Matthew 26:52, 5:44) are powerful statements used to argue that beings humans should “break the cycles of rivalry, jealousy, bitterness, hatred and violence” because God will rightly “give rain and sunshine” to each individual, according to his or her actions. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper now from our expert writers. Get a Custom Essay In summary, to establish an orderly legal system that functions clearly, our Founding Fathers wrote the Declaration of Independence, which incorporated a.