Biological Determinism An important milestone in the field of criminology was the first science-based crime study, even though the science was flawed; Cesare Lombroso's theory of biological determinism. This theory, based on the text, stated that people can be "born criminals", and the pseudo-science that proved this theory was based on the study of the corpses of executed criminals. This theory is not dangerous only because of its irrationality. , but also because of its so-called “scientific” support, since most studies based on biological determinism have not been performed according to the scientific method. I wouldn't be shocked if this theory was used as an excuse for racism or sexism, and it is sincere, I would be more surprised if it wasn't used as evidence of bigotry. However, the importance of the development of science in the field of criminology is not lost on me, although the scientific method was not applied correctly in this case. nor was the association of sample data from the corpses of executed criminals to the population of “all criminals” a significant step in sociology, moving into an area of ​​theory supported by evidence is able to discredit the theory of biological determinism and its various adaptations, such as the school of heredity and somatypes, through the correct use of the scientific method. This situation mirrors masculinity theory, as both were based on frankly absurd principles, exhibited bigotry and sexism from the 1850s to the early 1900s, and are rejected today in favor of more logical theories such as biosocial theory. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay What we can take away from both of these theories, the masculinity theory and biological determinism, is that relying on a cause or motive for criminality is not an accurate predictor of criminality. Physiology is not the only reason why people commit violent crimes, nor is the presence of “masculine” traits in women the only reason why women commit crimes. Biosocial theory provides a much broader explanation of the causality of crime, attributing it to a combination of psychological, physiological and social factors. This not only is an explanation for those who we might easily predict would become criminals, but it also explains the lack of criminality in those who share similar risks to criminals, such as an unstable home environment. Biosocial theory is a much more rational justification for the cause of crime, and this is because it does not rely on a single reason for the cause of crime.