Imagine your family being murdered in a horrific manner by a serial killer, who is eventually arrested, but the judge sentences him to just 12 years. How would you feel? Will you feel satisfied with the punishment given to the murderer? or will you feel vengeful for the significantly weak punishment that was given to the criminal? This is where capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, comes into play. It gives closure and emotional relief to the families of the victims, it also saves the lives of innocent citizens and is extremely crucial for maintaining national security. We say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Whatever people's views towards the death penalty, one thing that most people will never know is the pain felt by victims when their family members are brutally abused and killed. However, when the death penalty is given to criminals, it gives some form of closure to the victim's family members. On October 11, 1993, 18-year-old Julie Heath (June 11, 1975 - October 11, 1993) was driving on U.S. Highway 270 between Malvern and Hot Springs, Arkansas, to visit her boyfriend in Hot Springs when she was raped and murdered by sex offender 45 years old, Eric Nance. He was sentenced to death by the federal judge of the Eastern District of Arkansas. After a lethal injection, he was pronounced dead at 9.24pm in 2005. Although the family members had to endure extreme pain and suffering, the criminal's death penalty gave them some closure and decreased the risk of crime . in the form of revenge that potentially would have followed when the killer had not been sentenced to death. As a human being, when a person takes the life of another person, it is emotionally right for him or her to be placed in a correctional facility and have their life taken the same way they ended the life of another. This is therefore evidence in favor of the death penalty, as it achieves its goal of providing some emotional closure to victims and their families. There is no doubt that executing certain people for committing murder subsequently causes other potential murderers to reconsider killing someone and saving the innocent lives of citizens. According to a dozen studies, for every prisoner executed, 3 to 18 murders are prevented. The impact is more nuanced among inmates in Texas and other states, some studies have indicated. Over the past decade, economists have compared the number of executions in different authorities with the murder rate over time and have said that murder rates tend to decline as executions increase. “I personally am against the death penalty, but my research shows that there is a deterrent effect,” said H. Naci Mocan, an economist at Louisiana State University who was the first to discover that five people survive every execution. Although some economists have harshly criticized the studies, stating that the logical theories of economists do not apply to the world of executions, Gary Becker, Nobel Prize winner for economics in 1992, added: “the evidence of a variety of types, and not simply the quantitative evidence, it was enough to convince me that capital punishment is a deterrent and worth using for the worst types of crimes.” Furthermore, Professors Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule, professors of law at Harvard, stated in their article, Stanford Law Review, “the recent evidence of a deterrent effect of capital punishment seems impressive, especially in light of its 'apparent power and unanimity.' ”. One of the most important studies states that the.