Fracking, being still generally new, also has fewer laws on managing the procedure. This is a question of procedural fairness from multiple points of view. Those who are influenced are denied honest data from organizations about what is really happening. By the time you get into court conflict with one of the organizations, the people affected are at a reasonable disadvantage due to lack of learning and lack of money. Much of the general population simply does not have the money to proceed with the procedural procedure. Without administrative laws on fracking, organizations are given a privileged position as the shameful acts they carry out are not considered illegal. Likewise, equity in recognition is another issue that hinders influenced individuals. Organizations and the government tend not to see the situation the affected people are in and claim that the water and air are totally protected. Those affected who attempted to enter the procedural procedure would settle in light of the fact that it was less expensive in the long run. The people who settled were not allowed to say anything about the organizations, leaving them with even less recognition. The careless laws of parliament and the deep pockets of organizations have come together, exacerbated the problems and left those affected in abhorrent conditions. It created an endless cycle where no recognition led to problems in the procedural process, and issues in the procedural process led to purchases that brought even less recognition. Although the people involved have signed a lease agreement allowing the organizations to use their territory, outstanding issues should be handled. Until new laws are enacted that place more regulations and burden on organizations, these shameful acts will continue