Topic > The stories of our imagination: Jerome Brunner

In creating stories: law, literature, life, Jerome Brunner pushes us to reflect on the characteristics of stories, but also to consider the various ways in which we use them to navigate the difficult situation of the experiences of a human being. Narratives are meant to be innate and we presumably understand how they work. We hardly take the time to think about how our narratives, or anyone else's, bind us, and why the news has the power to revise our beliefs and hinder our intellect, or how it damages our humanoid institutions. Furthermore, it is argued that stories are the "building blocks" of human experiences and are also a very important piece of what we call "Self", along with the emblem of our interactions with society, also distinguishing us from the extremely assertive humanoid. institutions, despite the Law. Making stories comes from the argument that narrative is crucial to our soundness, reason, and education in explaining and understanding human experiences. The uses of story: according to Brunner, a story is illustrious by a series of shocking events by a vicissitude; a sudden reversal of circumstances: “a seemingly sincere English Oxbridge doctor turns out to have leaked atomic secrets to the Russians, or a supposedly merciful god suddenly asks faithful Abraham to sacrifice his son Isaac.” (Brunner.pp.5). Because of our vulnerability to narratives, we come to expect and believe traditional everyday experiences in a story. The stories show a sense of path to deal with the mistakes and surprises that occur in our daily lives. As humans, we are not always ambitious in showing our propensity for stories. Brunner opens the mind to understand the unshakable veracity of l...... half of the article...... in this regard, doctors often fail to understand the clues that a particular treatment is faulty. Making Stories: Law, Literature, Life clings to the discussion of how; stories operate in our normal lives, including how stories can benefit us as a force for change for diversity. I believe, Bruner, that it pushes us to look microscopically at what we ourselves have previously perceived only instinctively; people interacting through narratives. The stories, evidently, go far beyond the amusing aberrations of the good and bad times we've been through in the past; they can remain as portals to the truth and one's integrity that hides behind the cloak of “facts” with which we primarily, often alone, concern ourselves. It was clear to me that the above was the greatest memo that could be perceived from the publication.